My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-99-80
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC-99-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:57 AM
Creation date
3/23/2004 9:37:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/27/1999
DOCUMENT NO
PC-99-80
DOCUMENT NAME
SP-99-02
NOTES
SF WATER DEP
NOTES 3
APPROVAL OF SP PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Facts in Supoort of Pin ding: The impact will be avoided or reduced based on the <br />following: <br /> <br />a. The Land Use Element of the September 1998 Specific Plan includes <br />policies regulating golf course development and environmental considerations. Guideline <br />2.6 requires a golf course water quality management program be prepared that includes <br />"best management practices" standards for the use and storage of fertilizers, herbicides <br />and other chemicals. In addition, the Public Facilities and Services Element contains <br />Storm Drainage Management policies which also require preparation of a water quality <br />management plan for the golf course, driving range and parks that includes standards for <br />use and storage of fertilizers, herbicides and other chemicals. <br /> <br />b. Master PUD Conditions 31 and 82 require, prior to approval of the Golf <br />Course PUD, a Water Quality Management program be prepared for the golf course. The <br />plan must include best management practice standards for use and storage of fertilizers. <br />herbicides and other chemicals at the golf course and driving range. <br /> <br />5. Imoact 06. Potential adverse effects of site development on raptor nesting. <br /> <br />Mitil!ation Measure: <br />Measure 06a. Prior to development-related activity on the site, confirm presence of the <br />nest. <br /> <br />Measure 06b. Restrict development in the vicinity ofthe red-tailed hawk nest. <br /> <br />Findinl!: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project <br />which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect identified in the <br />Final EIR to a less than significant level. <br /> <br />Facts in Suooort of Findinl!: The impact will be avoided or reduced based on the <br />following: <br /> <br />a. Master PUD Conditions 50f and 102 require that the Property Owner <br />conduct a red-tailed hawk nest survey prior to any grading activity in the southem half of <br />the Western Area. If red-tailed hawk nesting is occurring during the time grading activity <br />will occur, improvements in the vicinity of the nest should be coordinated with <br />representatives of the Califomia Department ofFish and Game to minimize disturbance <br />and possible loss of the active nest during the nesting time. These conditions call for <br />establishment of a buffer area around the nesting site within which certain disruptive <br />activities (grading, construction, regional trails, irrigated areas of the golf course) are <br />restricted. The buffer area should extend 50 feet from the base of the trunk or 25 feet <br />from the drip line of the tree in which the nest is located, whichever is greater. <br /> <br />SF:FMP\AGR\WEX\6II31664.2 <br />062499 <br /> <br />A-49 <br /> <br />WEX-66OIJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.