_Minutes_December 11, 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

outside the impact area addressed; the author has discretion as to whether they want to go beyond this level for analysis. Mr. Jarvis confirmed that City staff and ESA have both reviewed and determined there is no reason to go beyond the threshold. Exceptions might be used for industrial facilities or something that produces unusual impacts and the analysis conducted determined they were far from any thresholds. Commissioner Pace inquired why 1,000 feet is used. Mr. Jarvis confirmed this is the regulatory standard recommended by BAAQMD. Chair Allen referenced the second question as it relates to the cumulative impact which was already answered. She then referenced the third question and the data source for the pass-by assumptions related to trips generated by traffic and impact of the project. Mr. Jarvis responded this is the first time the question has been raised and they can provide more details at the City Council level. He spoke about pass-by trips, weekend versus weekday traffic and believes there is sufficient information and analysis in the record to support the EIR's conclusions. Commissioner Ritter inquired about the new analysis and confirmed with Mr. Jarvis that he did not see any genuine EIR issues and that the comments were more or less a way to slow the process of the project moving forward. Chair Allen referenced the correspondence received by Matt Sullivan and inquired about the comments and questions brought up in his letter. Mr. Jarvis stated this letter indicates the writer is not amenable with the responses that have been provided within the document. Commissioner Balch referenced that the response to the question was answered within the EIR as it relates to air quality from idling vehicles and daily delivery trucks. Chair Allen referred to Item 4 on page 1 or page 3-89, Comment 13-5 and whether the fuel delivery truck was traveling to and from the site and whether the idling on site was included in the emissions analysis. Commissioner Balch noted the response is that the analysis included both travel and idling emissions and emissions from daily delivery trips. Chair Allen then referred to the public comment received by Brian Flynn regarding formaldehyde. Mr. Jarvis responded that this public comment was restating comments made in the comment letter of August 21, 2019 and those concerns were fully addressed within the EIR. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 December 11, 2019 asanton and the model uses those as the primary input for the assessment conducted. Chair Allen referred to the next item referenced in the correspondence as to health risk and the response that because other projects are beyond 1,000 feet from the project site, they are Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 December 11, 2019 anned Unit Development— Hillside Residential/Open Space (PUD-HR/OS) District MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC 3. Public Comment from the audience regarding items not listed on the agenda — Speakers are encouraged to limit comments to 3 minutes.