My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
121719
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2022 8:44:11 AM
Creation date
12/11/2019 2:12:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
13 ATTACHMENT 2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\121719
13 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\121719
13 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\121719
13 ATTACHMENT 5
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\121719
13 ATTACHMENT 6
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\121719
13 ATTACHMENT 7
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\121719
13 ATTACHMENT 8
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\121719
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• New COA No. 9 — do not allow occupancy of the new commercial building pending <br /> the City's completion of a planned righthand turn pocket from southbound Hopyard <br /> Road onto Owens Drive. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The Planning Commission agenda report (Attachment 3) dated September 25, 2019 <br /> provides additional background information and a detailed discussion of the proposed <br /> project, including General Plan consistency, PUD Ordinance consistency, site <br /> development, parking and access, traffic and circulation, architectural design, tree <br /> removal, landscaping, proposed uses and project feedback received at the Planning <br /> Commission work session of September 28, 2016. <br /> Prior to, and at the meeting, members of the Planning Commission requested additional <br /> information on existing traffic conditions, particularly congestion and queuing associated <br /> with the nearby Chik-Fil-A restaurant, and with respect to the impacts of the project. <br /> This topic was also discussed at some length during the Planning Commission hearing. <br /> In response, staff prepared a supplemental memorandum (Attachment 5), providing <br /> some more detailed analysis and information. Since this was the principal topic of <br /> concern, the key information and findings with respect to the traffic analysis are <br /> summarized below. <br /> Traffic Impact Analysis/Methodology/and Findings <br /> The City's Traffic Engineer evaluated the traffic impacts of the proposed project, <br /> including the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report (Attachment 6). <br /> The TIA utilizes standard "trip generation" rates for the project's proposed uses, based <br /> on Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) standard land use categories. In this case the <br /> existing trip generation for the site was based on the land use category "High-Turnover <br /> Sit-Down Restaurant," and the future trip generation based on the ITE categories "Fast <br /> Food Restaurant" and "Retail."2 The TIA and associated traffic modeling took account of <br /> existing approved uses, as well as a future Costco and other development in the <br /> Johnson Drive area. <br /> The ITE has a separate category and trip generation rate for coffee/donut and <br /> bread/bagel shops. These categories were not used in the TIA analysis; however, <br /> compared to the "Fast Food Restaurant" category analyzed in the TIA, they have a <br /> much higher morning (AM) trip generation rate, but a similar evening (PM) trip <br /> generation. Based on these rates, the project with a coffee/donut or bread/bagel shop <br /> would generate a combined AM/PM peak approximately 223 to 478 net new vehicle <br /> trips daily above a similarly sized and TIA modeled fast food use. <br /> The main findings of the TIA were as follows: <br /> 2 4,980 square feet of restaurant and 6,000 square feet of retail uses analyzed. <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.