04 - Laserfiche WebLink

CITY OF PLEASANTON CLIMATE ACTION PLAN UPDATE The final set of strategies will be based on the results of the multi-criteria System-change analysis(see Task 6), as well as the final forecasts and reduction targets we arrive at in Tasks 3-5.We will deliver the final set of strategies to the City in architecture the form of a memo indicating the City's desired components: a description of the City's role and department lead(s); linkages to existing City plans, LEVER:General approach to codes,or activities; identification of stakeholders and partners;estimated dramatically changing underlying benefit of implementation,quantified when feasible;description of co- system drivers. In general,cities benefits;and a timeline of actionable next steps.We will also document our have four levers: strategy prioritization findings with a user-friendly matrix described in Task 8. 1. Encouraging voluntary action Our Implementation Plan,to be delivered as part of Task 10,will further 2. Sending price signals ensure that the City can hit the ground running and quickly put final CCAP 3. Making public investments measures into practice. 4. Mandating change Deliverables: STRATEGY: Application of a lever • Draft and final memo outlining the foundational vision,goals, past in the context of a specific system. progress,and context underlying the CAP process ACTION: Specific services, • Spreadsheet documenting initial actions appropriations,taxes, subsidies, • Draft and final memo with shortlist of prioritized and ranked strategies regulations,or other mechanisms cities use to implement a strategy. Task 8 — Develop a user-friendly GHG reduction action matrix EXAMPLE:Waste Emission System LEVER: Encouraging voluntary Cascadia will document the strategy prioritization findings using a matrix that action clearly identifies the relative GHG reduction potential,cost,co-benefits,and other important considerations such as political feasibility and urgency.We STRATEGIES: Encourage will also include the final score generated using the weighted evaluation improved composting of food and factors in Tasks 6-7 to clearly show the priority ranking of each selected food-soiled paper action.Since it's likely that there will be a large number of actions in the final CAP 2.0 document,we recommend including a separate matrix for each ACTIONS: A) Promote sector to make the results more user-friendly and easier to comprehend; the competitive challenges among full matrix can also be included as an appendix to provide a reference guide restaurants and multifamily to strategies across all sectors.To improve engagement,we will use visual buildings; B) Use public facilities cues such as icons and/or color-coding to highlight key"vital signs"for each as venues to educate the public selected action. and as pilot sites to test new composting practices. Deliverables: • Draft and final user-friendly matrix of selected GHG-reduction actions Task 9 — Develop "model resolution/ordinance" templates Our team has identified several key measures which, if selected by the City,will require ordinances, code updates,or resolutions to take effect.Two primary examples are electrification ordinances and electric vehicle charging ordinances. Rincon is currently working with multiple cities throughout the Bay Area to develop reach codes and ordinances around these two topics.We will draw on our experience writing ordinances for cities throughout California and our database of current draft reach codes to provide templates for up to three(3)ordinances/resolutions. Additional templates can be completed on a time-and-materials basis. Deliverables: • Up to three draft ordinance/resolution templates ASCADIA 8