Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Balch moved to approve Case P19-0342, Exhibit A, Attachment 1 with the <br /> following changes to Section A: (1) Clarified that City approval must be in written form; <br /> (2) Section B, Fines: fines for unpermitted demolition shall be based upon the greater of <br /> either the appraised value or replacement value; and (3) add language that the <br /> replacement building shall be the same or comparable historical style. <br /> Commissioner Ritter seconded motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Brown, O'Connor and Ritter <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Commissioner Pace <br /> Resolution PC-2019-25 recommending approval to City Council was adopted, with <br /> amendments to the language, as motioned. <br /> MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION <br /> 5. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> There were no reports from meetings attended. <br /> 6. Future Planning Calendar <br /> Ms. Clark gave a brief overview of future items for the Commission's review. <br /> 7. Actions of the City Council <br /> No action was taken. <br /> 8. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br /> No action was taken. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> None <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> Chair Allen adjourned the meeting at 9:03 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Stefanie Ananthan <br /> Recording Secretary <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 12 November 13, 2019 <br />reater of either replacement <br /> value or appraised value, likes the wording "same or comparable historical styles" and Chair <br /> Allen's comments. This would allow for leeway yet achieve what they want. <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced language in Exhibit A, Section B under Fines and said the <br /> word "can be based upon" is the point of his question and he asked why it should instead state <br /> "shall, or must, be based upon". <br /> Mr. Dolan confirmed that the language will be amended to replace "can be" with "shall be". <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced Section A and asked whether any prior written City approval <br /> is required, or he questioned whether or not this mattered. <br /> Ms. Harryman said for a permit and a design review approval it is unlikely to be an over-the- <br /> counter agreement. <br /> Commissioner Balch suggested this be clarified to state "prior written City approval." <br /> Chair Allen said the intent is that they do not want demolitions occurring and this ordinance is <br /> to prevent this from reoccurring, as well as for the ordinance to be punitive, and these <br /> standards being set make sense and serve as a deterrent. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 12 November 13, 2019 <br />ower quality home that happened to be on the list, she would rather see that <br /> upgraded to Craftsmen or Victorian style that would be on the list. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor restated his desire for the design to meet one of the context <br /> statements. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 12 November 13, 2019 <br /> 12 November 13, 2019 <br />reater than six feet but not <br /> over eight feet in height may occupy a required site or rear yard" and he stated the screen wall <br /> is 20 feet high; (2) "All additions to main structure which exceed 10 feet in height shall be <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 12 November 13, 2019 <br /> at 6700 Santa Rita Road, Suite C. <br /> Zoning for the project is a Planned Unit Development— Commercial (PUD-C). <br />