Laserfiche WebLink
applicable zoning and development standards for housing projects. Both of these <br /> requirements will require additional staff time. <br /> AB 1485 (Wicks) makes additional changes to laws previously adopted under SB35, <br /> that require much faster processing and streamlined review for housing projects that <br /> meet certain criteria for affordability and in other areas. AB 1485 changes the minimum <br /> affordability requirements for projects qualifying for streamlining from 10% of total units <br /> at an affordability level of 80% Area Median Income (AMI) or less to 20% of total units at <br /> an affordability level of 120% AMI, with the average across all of the units to be at or <br /> below 100% AMI. No SB35-qualifying projects have yet been proposed in Pleasanton, <br /> and, at this time it remains to be seen how the changes may influence potential project <br /> proposals. <br /> Funding <br /> SB5, the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Program, would <br /> have created a significant new funding source (up to $2 Billion annually) for affordable <br /> housing. Governor Newsom vetoed this bill, indicating that a bill with such substantial <br /> financial implications needed to be discussed as part of the overall State budget. <br /> Funding and Local Control <br /> AB 1487 (Chiu) creates a new regional housing entity: the San Francisco Bay Area <br /> Housing Financing Authority (BAHFA). The Authority will be governed by the <br /> Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Board (serving as the lead <br /> agency) and Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The Authority will enable <br /> Bay Area voters to raise money for affordable housing. However, it does not allow for <br /> BAHFA to institute any sales tax measures, and will require 80 percent of funds to be <br /> "returned to source" — i.e. to go back to the county of origin. At this time, the direct <br /> impact (or benefit) to the City is unknown as any funding measures will go before the <br /> voters to decide. City staff will continue to be engaged as the entity forms, and as <br /> Alameda County determines its return to source methodology, to ensure that funds <br /> generated by Pleasanton residents or businesses benefit the community to the extent <br /> possible. <br /> Non-housing Related Bills <br /> The Council took positions on ten other bills in the areas of transportation, maintaining <br /> local control, water and the environment. AB 1475, sponsored by local Assembly <br /> member Rebecca Bauer Kahan, to streamline the development of a portion of the Iron <br /> Horse Trail was supported by Council, and was signed into law. As shown in Table 2, all <br /> of the other non-housing related bills became two-year bills. Additional information on <br /> each of the bills listed in the table below is provided in Attachment 2. <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />