Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Testa thanked the project team for their efforts and said the Aquatic Center could <br /> benefit from having solar panels in the parking lot. <br /> Councilmember Narum feels the City has an opportunity to use solar energy to heat the pools. City <br /> Manager Fialho advised that once additional staffing resources are made available, energy priorities <br /> will be addressed. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Brown to accept the recommendation of the Go Green Initiative Energy <br /> Benchmark Report. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Pentin, Testa, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> 20. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider introduction of an ordinance approving the application of Saravana <br /> Chilla for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan to demolish an existing home and <br /> construct three detached single-family homes and related improvements located at 3987 Stanley <br /> Boulevard, and approval of a growth management agreement, as filed under Case PUD-133 <br /> Planning Manager Ellen Clark presented a brief overview of the PUD and a timeline of the application. <br /> She noted the Planning Commission recommended modification of the paint color and additional <br /> landscape screening. The project was approved with the modified condition to require larger initial <br /> planting size. Tte project is located within the Downtown Specific Plan area and the site contains an <br /> existing single-family home which is included as part of the City's historic resources survey. The home <br /> was determined not to be a historic resource. <br /> Ms. Clark reported that the site plan is to develop three new single-family homes. She noted the <br /> proposed density is 9 units per acre and is within the allowable General Plan density. She outlined the <br /> Development Standards and presented a Development Standards Comparison chart; reported that the <br /> project is well within the range of density and similar density of projects around it and has comparable <br /> lot and unit sizes. She presented renderings of the project, provided an overview of landscaping for the <br /> project and noted the large oak tree in the rear of the property will be preserved. <br /> At the Planning Commission hearing key issues and concerns were privacy, density, and neighborhood <br /> character. She advised the Planning Commission recommended an additional condition for larger initial <br /> planting sizes for screening vegetation and said the PUD conforms to the General Plan and Zoning <br /> Ordinance and its use would be compatible with the other residential development and development <br /> standards in the vicinity. Additionally, she noted the proposed density, development standards, <br /> architecture, site design, lot configuration, and landscaping are consistent with the Zoning, Downtown <br /> Specific Plan, and General Plan goals and policies. Lastly, she noted the increase of two residential <br /> units are within the available Growth Management Allocation. <br /> Ms. Clark reported staff recommends that City Council introduce the ordinance approving PUD-133 and <br /> adopt a resolution approving a Growth Management Allocation, subject to the draft finding and <br /> condition of approval. <br /> In response to Councilmember Brown's inquiry, Ms. Clark advised that window placements were <br /> addressed during the Planning Commission hearing and both the Planning Commission and staff felt <br /> the windows were located appropriately. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiry, Ms. Clark advised that rehabbing the existing property <br /> was not included in the PUD. City Attorney Daniel Sodergren clarified the property did not meet the <br /> criteria to be listed on the historic property list. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 October 1, 2019 <br />