Laserfiche WebLink
Council recessed to a break at 9:12 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:22 p.m. with all members <br /> present with exception of Testa. <br /> Council reconfirmed their prior direction as follows: <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Brown to approve the massage establishment requirements item within <br /> the DSP. Motion passed unanimously. Testa recused. <br /> Planning Manager Clark clarified that the Active Ground Floor Overlay item should be extended to side <br /> streets and whether some exemptions should be applied to bank buildings. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Pentin to approve the Active Ground Floor Overlay item within the <br /> DSP. Motion passed unanimously. Testa recused. <br /> Planning Manager Clark clarified that the original decision was to not allow ground-floor residential uses <br /> on properties with a Main Street frontage or within the Mixed-use Downtown area. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Pentin to approve the Ground-floor residential use item within the DSP. <br /> Motion passed unanimously. Testa recused. <br /> Planning Manager Clark clarified the original decision on the Barone's property was to allow for <br /> rezoning to mixed-use transitional" for the redevelopment of that site. She further advised the original <br /> First Street property decision was to approve a residential overlay subject to a PUD. In response to <br /> Mayor Thorne's inquiry, Acting Director of Community Development Dolan advised that the Barone's <br /> property would need to maintain a commercial front to retain the residential overlay. <br /> In response to Councilmember Pentin's inquiry, Planning Manager Clark clarified the First Street <br /> property would be subject to the Downtown Commercial zoning standard which allows for up to 40 feet <br /> with two-stories encouraged and three-stories allowed on a case-by-case basis. <br /> In response to Councilmember Pentin's inquiry, City Manager Fialho clarified that if the First Street <br /> property went to residential only, it would be limited to two-stories. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Pentin to approve the Barone's property-owner-initiated request. <br /> Motion passed with Brown voting no and Testa recused. <br /> Councilmember Brown expressed concern regarding the height of the building with subterranean <br /> parking. Acting Director of Community Development Dolan advised that with a PUD, City Council can <br /> give staff direction to consider a third story on the First Street property. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Narum to approve the First Street property-owner-initiated request. <br /> Motion passed with Brown voting no and Testa recused. <br /> Planning Manager Clark recapped the Development standards and the maximum height for each land <br /> use district. In response to Councilmember Brown's inquiry, Planning Manager Clark advised that a <br /> four-story project could not be supported with current language. <br /> In response to Councilmember Pentin's inquiry regarding items such as radio towers and flagpoles, <br /> Planning Manager Clark advised this is a clarification of existing Municipal Code language to allow for <br /> such items and architectural features. Councilmember Pentin supported the recommendation that <br /> nothing over three-stories gets approved. Councilmember Brown recommended that staff define the <br /> term "story." Councilmember Brown suggests that any PUD requesting three-story properties be <br /> reviewed by Council. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 11 August 20, 2019 <br />