My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082819
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 082819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2019 1:39:56 PM
Creation date
9/27/2019 1:39:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/28/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Hagen confirmed that screening trees could be planted as opposed to shrubs, and the <br /> Planning Commission could condition this with staff to work with the applicant as part of the <br /> building permit submittal. <br /> Chair Allen said she was not present at the workshop but read the minutes and said some of <br /> the Planning Commissioners asked that staff explore the placement of windows as a way to <br /> improve privacy. She asked what had been found, if this was explored. <br /> Ms. Hagen confirmed that adjustment to the window placement was not found to be necessary <br /> based upon trees and existing and new vegetation, in addition to the 30-foot setback. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor said he also was not present at the workshop, but it appears that <br /> most of the items were mitigated from comments. <br /> Ms. Hagen confirmed and believes the applicant has addressed concerns raised at the <br /> workshop. <br /> Chair Allen referenced the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Design Guidelines and the <br /> discussion that occurred during the workshop in regard to the homes being constructed in this <br /> area as front-facing. She inquired about the pros and cons mentioned as it relates to homes <br /> being front facing to Stanley Boulevard. <br /> Ms. Hagen said the DSP encourages homes to face Stanley Boulevard or the main street, but <br /> it is not a requirement. During review, staff decided that based upon the architectural detailing <br /> and wrap-around porch, as designed, the project provided enhanced architectural details <br /> facing Stanley Boulevard, although the front door faces the interior of the private driveway. <br /> Based upon the lower elevation of the home and the view seen, having the front face towards <br /> Stanley Boulevard would not drastically enhance the project. Therefore, staff felt it was <br /> acceptable for the front door to face the interior drive. <br /> Commissioner Pace noted that all homes on Rachael Place face to the interior as opposed to <br /> the street, so he thought this was uniform. <br /> Commissioner Brown said much of the discussion at the workshop was that if the fence was <br /> against the street and stood five feet lower, someone would only see the top four or five feet, <br /> which might not be visually appealing versus having a wrap-around porch with a side entrance. <br /> He inquired about the maturity of the vegetation on the east side, to address the adjacent <br /> neighbor's concerns, and asked how long it would take before the vegetation would provide <br /> screening as a privacy measure. <br /> Ms. Hagen responded that typically a smaller initial gallon or box size trees will grow quicker <br /> due to the space in which they are planted. Of the existing vegetation, she said it will take <br /> about three years before it screens the line of sight. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Applicant Saravana Chilla spoke in regard to the project and said he is trying to construct the <br /> homes in a way that appeases everyone. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />