My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
100119
>
20 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2019 9:24:31 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 3:03:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Document Relationships
20
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\100119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Updated Arborist Report <br />3987 Stanley <br />Pleasanton, CA <br />Introduction and Overview <br />You are planning to construct multiple housing units on the property you recently purchased. The <br />large lot had a house, detached garage, two out buildings and was moderately forested. The <br />City of Pleasanton requires that an Arborist Report be prepared as part of project submittals. <br />This report provides the following information: <br />1. An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees within the proposed <br />project area based on a visual inspection from the ground. <br />2. An assessment of the impacts of constructing the proposed project on the trees. <br />3. An appraisal value of the trees according to the procedures described in the Guide for <br />Plant Appraisal (Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers). <br />4. Guidelines for tree preservation prior to and during the demolition and construction <br />phases of development. <br />Tree Assessment Methods <br />Trees were assessed on December 8, 2016. The survey included trees 6" in diameter and <br />greater, located on the property and adjacent to property lines. The assessment procedure <br />consisted of the following steps: <br />1. Identifying the tree as to species; <br />2. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a map; <br />3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 4.5' above grade; <br />4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 — 5: <br />5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, with <br />good structure and form typical of the species. <br />4 -Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural <br />defects that could be corrected. <br />3 -Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of <br />crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated with <br />regular care. <br />2 -Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br />branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />1 -Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of foliage <br />from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />5. Rating the suitability for preservation as "high", "moderate" or "low". Suitability for <br />preservation considers the health, age and structural condition of the tree, and its <br />potential to remain an asset to the site for years to come. <br />High: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the potential <br />for longevity at the site. <br />Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects than <br />can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more intense <br />management and monitoring, and may have shorter life span than <br />those in `high' category. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.