Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance No. <br />Page 2 <br />1. Whether the proposed development plan is in the best interest of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare. <br />The City Council finds that the proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable <br />City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development <br />would include the installation of all required on-site utilities with connections to municipal <br />systems in order to serve the new lots. The proposed development is compatible with <br />the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the <br />area. Adequate setbacks would be provided between the new dwellings and the existing <br />structures on the adjacent properties. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that <br />cannot be accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The <br />proposed homes will be designed to meet the requirements of the California Building <br />Code, California Fire Code, and other applicable codes. As such, the Council concludes <br />this finding can be made. <br />2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton <br />General Plan and any applicable specific plan. <br />The proposed development includes the demolition an existing single-family home and <br />construction of three new single-family homes and related improvements on an <br />approximately 14,400 -square -foot lot. The City Council finds the proposed density of <br />nine dwelling units per acre conforms to the General Plan High Density Residential land <br />use designation which allows residential densities of over eight dwelling units per acre. <br />The proposed project promotes General Plan Programs and Policies encouraging new <br />housing to be developed on infill sites. <br />In addition to the General Plan, the proposed project is consistent with the High Density <br />Residential land use designation and intent of the Downtown Specific plan (DSP). There <br />are no development standards in the DSP for the subject lot, but the DSP includes <br />policies and programs that the subject lot should follow. The proposal is consistent with <br />the policies and programs and creates setbacks, density, landscaping, and character of <br />the subject lot consistent with the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br />The DSP and Downtown Design Guidelines recommend the use of traditional materials, <br />finishes, colors, and detailing as well as policies regarding specific allowable <br />architectural styles within the Downtown. The architectural style and design of the <br />homes meets the intent of the DSP and guidelines and would not conflict with the <br />neighborhood. As such, the Council concludes that this finding can be made. <br />3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the previously <br />developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, topographic features of the <br />site. <br />The neighborhood includes a mixture of one -and -two-story residences with a variety of <br />architectural styles. The City Council finds that the proposed lots and two-story <br />residences are compatible with the land use pattern in the neighborhood and previously <br />developed properties in the vicinity. The subject lot sits approximately five feet lower <br />than the grade of the public sidewalk and street but is generally flat once on-site. The <br />homes have been sited to minimize impacts on surrounding neighbors to the extent <br />feasible and have been designed to reduce their mass and not overpower the site. The <br />proposed project has been designed around a very large Valley Oak tree to the rear of <br />the property which will be retained as part of the application proposal. As such, the City <br />Council finds the development is sensitive to the existing vegetation on-site. Outdoor <br />