My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
100119
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2019 9:23:54 AM
Creation date
9/24/2019 3:47:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/1/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
20 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\100119
20 ATTACHMENT 3 - PLANS
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\100119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 18.68.110 sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit <br />Development District and considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development <br />plan. These purposes and considerations are set forth in the draft Resolution included as <br />Exhibit A, and includes whether the plan is in conformance with the City's General Plan, is in <br />the best interest of public health, safety, and general welfare, and whether the plan would be <br />compatible with developed properties in the vicinity. As described in Exhibit A, and based on <br />the information and analysis provided in this Agenda Report, staff recommends the <br />Commission make the required findings to recommend approval of the project. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000 - <br />foot radius of the site and published in the newspaper. At the time this report was published, <br />staff received one email in opposition of the project incâ–ºuded in Exhibit F. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California <br />Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br />pursuant to Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan. <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br />Staff has reviewed the subject proposal and believes the proposed density, development <br />standards, architecture, site design, lot configuration, and landscaping are consistent with the <br />Zoning, Downtown Specific Plan, and General Plan goals and policies including all regulations <br />and design guidelines. Staff also believes that the architectural style and design of the homes <br />are appropriate for the Downtown Specific Plan Area. Therefore, the project, as conditioned, <br />merits a favorable recommendation by the Commission. <br />Primary Authors: Jennifer Hagen, Associate Planner, 925-931-5607 or ihagen cityofpleasantonca.gov. <br />ReviewedlApproved By: <br />Steve Otto, Senior Planner <br />Ellen Clark, Planning Manager <br />Brian Dolan, Acting Community Development Director/Assistant City Manager <br />PUD -133, 3987 Stanley Boulevard Planning Commission <br />12 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.