My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
100119
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2019 9:23:54 AM
Creation date
9/24/2019 3:47:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/1/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
20 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\100119
20 ATTACHMENT 3 - PLANS
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\100119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FISCAL IMPACT <br />The project is expected to generate revenues to cover its costs of service as increases <br />in property taxes would be used to provide services, such as police and fire required for <br />the increased demand. The applicant will also be required to pay development impact <br />fees (e.g., capital facility fee, traffic fees, water/sewer connections, etc.) to offset the <br />cost of City facilities and infrastructure necessitated by the development. <br />BACKGROUND <br />The subject property was rezoned to PUD -HDR in 1990 as part of a PUD development <br />plan for 158 dwelling units on a larger combined project site totaling 12.76 acres. The <br />portion of that project located on the subject property was never built, and the PUD <br />development plan expired in 1992, but the PUD rezoning remains in place. <br />On October 19, 2018, the applicant submitted an application for PUD development plan <br />(PUD -133), to demolish the existing home and construct three new single-family homes. <br />The project was presented to the Planning Commission at a workshop on June 12, <br />2019. The workshop was attended by a neighbor from the property to the east, with <br />privacy concerns due to the proposed two-story homes. At the workshop, the Planning <br />Commission was generally supportive of the project, and requested additional <br />landscape screening for the adjacent property to the east and to provide a more neutral <br />color palette for the homes. Since the workshop, the applicant worked with staff on plan <br />revisions to address the Planning Commission's comments, including modifications to <br />the proposed landscape material along the east property line to increase screening, and <br />revising proposed paint colors for each of the homes. <br />On August 28, 2019, the application was presented to the Planning Commission at a <br />public hearing. At the hearing, seven members of the public spoke in opposition to the <br />project. The majority of the concerns raised focused on privacy, both for the adjacent <br />single family home to the east and the townhomes along Rachael Place to the west, as <br />well as the proposed density of the project and consistency with the neighborhood and <br />Downtown Specific Plan. See the Planning Commission agenda report, Attachment 2, and <br />the excerpted draft minutes of the August 28 Planning Commission hearing (Attachment 3) <br />for additional information. <br />SITE AND AREA DESCRIPTION <br />The subject lot is located on the north side of Stanley Boulevard (aka Old Stanley <br />Boulevard), between Main Street/Santa Rita Road and First Street/Stanley Boulevard, <br />as seen in Figure 1. <br />The property is surrounded by a variety of residential home types that range in density <br />and size from high-density attached townhomes to the north and west, to detached <br />single-family homes to the south and east. The existing houses in the neighborhood are <br />a mix of one- and two-story homes. The subject 14,400 -square -foot lot sits <br />approximately five feet lower than the grade of the public sidewalk and street but is <br />Page2of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.