19 - Laserfiche WebLink

BACKGROUND The Go Green Initiative is a Pleasanton -based nonprofit organization focused on natural resource conservation and environmental stewardship. Through grassroots efforts, the Go Green Initiative seeks to mobilize citizens to create a culture of conservation within their communities. The City has collaborated with the Go Green Initiative in the past, most recently on education efforts related to compliance with green waste requirements for Downtown businesses. As part of their program, this year the Go Green Initiative established a summer intern cohort of 32 Pleasanton -educated high school and college students. The interns worked on a project to benchmark energy use in buildings owned by the City of Pleasanton and the Pleasanton Unified School District, and have prepared the results of their benchmarking of City facilities in a report and presentation to Council. DISCUSSION The Go Green Initiative Interns determined six findings in their benchmarking of 24 City facilities, and have prepared the results in the attached report. The report defines energy benchmarking as a practice used to measure a building's energy efficiency by comparing it to similar buildings, and outlines the importance of benchmarking in enabling better management of energy consumption and costs, as well as compliance with energy-related regulations. The report contains short- and long-term recommendations for the City to increase energy efficiency and reduce energy expenditures. The report also includes a section on the alignment of the benchmarking results and recommendations with the Pleasanton Climate Action Plan, which is prioritized within the 2019-2020 City Council Work Plan. Findings 1. Correlation between City buildings with installed solar panels and lower site energy use intensity (EUI), indicating a favorable relationship between solar panels and a lower EUI. 2. No correlation between the year the building was founded and the site's EUI. 3. The Aquatic Center and the Golf Course Clubhouse have the highest site EUI of all City facilities studied, making them the most inefficient in terms of energy use and the most expensive to power. 4. None of the buildings studied qualify for Energy Star Certification — 23 of the 24 buildings studied do not qualify due to the property type (Energy Star scores cannot be calculated). 123 Main Street is able to be calculated, but its low Energy Star score of 34 makes it ineligible for certification (a score of 75 or higher qualifies for Energy Star Certification). 5. During the measurement period of August 1, 2018 through July 31, 2019, the energy cost across the facilities totaled $906,560. If the facilities operated at or below the median cost per square foot of the studied buildings, the City would experience lower energy costs, amounting to $274,406 in savings. 6. Ina 12 -month period, the 24 facilities studied emitted a total of 1,299 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents. If the facilities operated at or below the median emissions intensity of the studied buildings, the City would reduce emissions by Page 2 of 3