3_Exhibits A & C-F - Laserfiche WebLink

of the building. We feel that what we're presenting tonight, what we're showing you, looking for your feedback is a solution that makes sense. It's reflective of our substantial efforts to reach that 12 car requirement even though we're one car short. So we're open to discussion about that issue. I'm happy to answer any questions that you may have on the architecture too. Commissioner Balch: Those are canvas awnings? Grant: Those are canvas. Commissioner Balch: Okay and how far do those project out? Are they for the sun or are they actually for rain protection as well? Grant: They're for rain protection as well so code-wise; every door requires four feet of cover so they're a minimum of four feet. Commissioner Balch: And my other question was that staff's report mentioned the north elevation; the queueing elevation. Any comments on that or any thoughts on their request to spruce up the wall to the hotel? Grant: Yes, we can accommodate that. Commissioner Nagler: Eric, could you go back to the site plan? So, I hate to go back and talk about version five or whatever it turned out to be, but I'll just ask. It's two separate buildings because of the requirement for the driveway? Is that right? Grant: No, it was two separate buildings because the City really felt that by slitting the buildings you got something on Owens and we were also able to screen the queueing. Commissioner Nagler: So what happens if you extended A-1 further towards Larkspur Drive and, I don't know if it's possible, but you weren't required to circulate the cars back into the parking lot but instead, all the cars from the driveway exited out to Larkspur Drive and you move the....l'm just pretending that the parking requirement isn't above.... Grant: ...that there isn't one. Commissioner Nagler: So you extend the building. You therefore lengthen the queue. You shield the queue, right? You exit the cars, as Commissioner Brown was suggesting, out to Larkspur Drive. You move the dumpster and like that to some other place and we then secondarily worry about the loss of parking spaces. Is that a possibility? Grant: Well, parking requirements are there for a reason. Commissioner Nagler: Well no, just to say out loud. If, for example.... Grant ....Based on the geometry of the site, is it possible to do that? Commissioner Nagler: If you weren't required to have that driveway to re-circulate the cars out into the parking lot and therefore didn't take up the space of that driveway, you know, exiting and therefore put a couple of more parking spaces there, right? See what I'm saying? Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 10 of 20 et in depth to 38 feet and we agreed to do that because we needed to come much closer to that 12 car queueing requirement. I had a discussion today with Adam about the agreement that I felt that we had as a result of one of the recent meetings where we had the 10 cars and the traffic report said 12 cars, and it was our understanding that if we could get one more car—if we could get to the 11th car—than that would be an acceptable solution because it's not a perfect size. It could be 13, it could be 12, it could be 11. We were at 10 and we were able to modify the site plan. It took a lot of effort to manipulate all of the different pieces and make sure we were satisfying the accessibility requirements and the distribution. At one time we had the two handicapped cars for accessible parking spaces located in front of Building A, but the request was made, can you get one car related to each building, and so we were able to do that. So, we're very hopeful because you know we're kind of up against the wall. That 12th car; the comment was made well, can we make Building B shallower. Well, we really can't. We really can't take another 20 feet for that 12th car out of the depth of Building B because then we're looking at a building's that probably 20 feet deep or we have to severely carve into the corner Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 9 of 20 ructural control such as an oil/water separator or sand filter. No other area shall P16-1349 and PUD-121 Planning Commission Page 11 of 19