3 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Photo simulations or renderings were requested with the project resubmittal to better visualize the proposed project within the context of the surrounding area. Figure 1: Work Session Site Plan r- oppEF CAMP' I r-TNMY YOU 31GN PoEtgL AFT,-7 = = C C - - r i ,�7. I e.D1 ; "till-Ci i*Mill;` _uP1 # fu' t ;��i ..,•CAR 1 r�7:. .r le-'••,UI: � ENCLOSURE . a _> 1� • U' 316 A.1._ i I` Ivy . ,\ ,Illii, 7- . 1 II - i`- ,_ EU.-...A-.:X $ t 1 , — - In U • ' v b ; I± V rafr ,LEAF NCE EAF h gg Iv -- — 28�11SF :. e � 1 ,:Ak 1 r 1 ,, , , , , 1 ,_,1 , , ,, , /, ;19fEI LEVEL PLAN Fi•ure 1a: Work Session Architecture r lid _..... ` --......:Irr,-. iiiiimmir41111111717'...411111E—C: -- : --.*:...t'' -wil-4.- - "4406' : k. .-,,s.,74-060 "-- P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission 3 of 15 nd discuss alternative design concepts for the subject site that addressed staffs comments from the preliminary review process. After numerous site layout and architectural design iterations, on July 25, 2016, the applicant submitted a PUD Rezoning and Development Plan application to construct two single-story commercial buildings totaling approximately 8,660-square-feet in area; and a Conditional Use Permit application to operate a drive-through coffee shop from one of the buildings. Planning Commission Work Session In order to receive early feedback from the Planning Commission and the public on the proposed project, a Planning Commission work session was held on September 28, 2016. No members of the public, other than the project architect, spoke on the project. The Planning Commission provided comments (summarized below) on the initial site plan and building architecture shown in Figures 1 and 1 a below. All comments made by the Planning Commission at the work session can be viewed in the attached minutes (Exhibit D). Planning Commission Work Session Comments • Drive-through was not supported given queueing concerns and spillback onto Johnson Court and Owens Drive, as well as potential on-site vehicular conflicts at drive-through exit and the drive aisle between the buildings. • Commission was split on new commercial buildings' orientation along Owens Drive — i.e. whether all parking should be at the rear and building required to front Owens Drive, versus new commercial buildings pushed back with parking in front. • Building design, materials and colors were acceptable. • Tree removal and tree replacement plan were acceptable. • The proposed uses were generally supported with a preference to include more uses allowed by C-F District. P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission 2 of 15