My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
4
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
08-28
>
4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2019 4:29:33 PM
Creation date
8/21/2019 3:35:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/28/2019
Document Relationships
4_Exhibit A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibit D - Draft Initial Study & Neg Dec
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
4_Exhibits E-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\08-28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Commission indicated that the proposed parking was acceptable. The majority of <br /> discussion focused on the proposed widening of the southernmost driveway on Hopyard Road <br /> from 35 feet to 45 feet. The Commission indicated that they may support a 40-foot wide <br /> driveway if the applicant could demonstrate a 40-foot wide driveway is needed to service this <br /> site. The current plan shows a 40-foot wide driveway. <br /> Discussion Point No. 4: <br /> Is the proposed building design acceptable? <br /> The Commission indicated the proposed building design is generally acceptable, but provided <br /> suggestions to improve some elements of the design, including that stone wainscoting should <br /> applied to all sides of the buildings, not just the elevations facing the streets. Chair Allen <br /> suggested that a higher-quality roofing material should be used, such as the clay tile roofing <br /> used at the 7-Eleven store located at 3192 Santa Rita Road that was constructed in 2016. <br /> The Commission also discussed whether a physical barrier should separate the project site <br /> from adjoining property to the south. The Commission indicated they prefer an attractive open <br /> fence approximately four feet in height, to retain visibility and discourage illicit activity in this <br /> area. <br /> SITE DESCRIPTION <br /> The project site contains two separate, but adjoining parcels owned by the same property <br /> owner. The parcels total approximately 39,726 square feet (0.91 acres) and are located at the <br /> southwest intersection of Hopyard Road and West Las Positas Boulevard. The applicant <br /> recently filed a Lot Line Adjustment application to merge the two parcels so that the project <br /> would occupy one single parcel, which will be considered following the project approvals. <br /> Hereafter, the two parcels will be referred to as the "project site." Figure 1 shows the project <br /> site and surrounding area. <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 4 of 24 <br /> <br /> the work session discussion points (additional comments made by the Commission are in the <br /> attached minutes — Exhibit C): <br /> Discussion Point No. 1: <br /> Would it be appropriate to rezone the site from the current C-N District to a PUD-C District in <br /> order to allow a 24-hour convenience market with the sale of alcoholic beverages and a drive- <br /> through carwash in conjunction with the existing gas station? <br /> Commissioners unanimously supported the proposed rezoning and uses. <br /> Discussion Point No. 2: <br /> Should the proposed triangular-shaped building be revised to a rectangular-shaped building <br /> oriented perpendicular to Hopyard Road, and to eliminate the loading space? <br /> The Commission unanimously concurred that the proposed shape and orientation of the <br /> convenience store building were acceptable and supported the loading space. <br /> Discussion Point No. 3: <br /> Are the proposed site plan, circulation, and parking acceptable? <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 3 of 24 <br /> a <br /> convenience market that would include the sale of alcoholic beverages, the applicant requests <br /> the current zoning of the site be changed in order to allow the proposed project. <br /> The proposed Planned Unit Development-Commercial (PUD-C) zoning would require a <br /> Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the service station with convenience market with the sale of <br /> PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission <br /> Page 2 of 24 <br />