4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Table 1: Comparison Between the Existing and the Proposed Structures Existing Proposed C-N District 7-Eleven Setbacks: East (Hopyard Road) 65' 37' West 8' 6" 10' South 15' 10' North (W. Las 14' 6" 198' Setbacks (min.): Positas Boulevard) Front = 20' (in Floor Area 2,224 sq. ft. 3,034 sq. ft. this case, the Height 21' 18' 8" building; project site has 24' 6" tower two front yards: Shell Canopy Hopyard Road Setbacks: and W. Las East (Hopyard Road) 4' 8' Positas West 80' 76' Boulevard) South 52' 109' North (W. Las 105' 90' Side = 20' Positas Boulevard) Canopy Area 1,325 sq. ft. 3,311 sq. ft. Rear = 10' Height 19' 20' 8" Smog Check and Carwash Height (max.) = Setbacks: Smog Check Carwash 30' East (Hopyard Road) 80' 115' West 17' 9" 9' 6" FAR (max.) = South 38' 3" 116' 30% North (W. Las 80' 57' Positas Boulevard) Floor Area 1,962 sq. ft. 1,290 sq. ft. Floor Area Ratio 10.6% 11% (FAR) Height 18' 17' 10" Total Building Area 4,186 sq. ft. 4,324 sq. ft. The project site is located on the southwest corner of W. Las Positas Blvd. and Hopyard Road. Hence, the site has two "front yards" and two "rear yards." The proposed building setbacks and heights meet the requirements of the C-N district. Although the canopy would be within the 20-foot front yard setback, it would be located farther way from Hopyard Road than the existing structure (8 feet, rather than four feet). Given that the project would generally conform to the existing C-N district standards, and in light of the existing conditions and the proposed building and site design, staff finds the proposed development standards are acceptable. PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission Page 18 of 24 uding building setbacks, building height, etc. Table 1 compares the setbacks, floor area, floor area ratio, and building height of the existing and proposed structures. The table also includes the development standards of the C-N District as reference. PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission Page 17 of 24 ing condition. Therefore, staff believes having the proposed uses on one site is supportable. However, if the sale of alcohol from the convenience store were to become problematic, the Director of Community Development can refer the Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission for subsequent review at a public hearing. Staff has added conditions to the Conditional Use Permit addressing the sale of beer and wine from the convenience market (e.g., conformance to State law regarding alcohol sales hours and training for the convenience store operators in dealing with inebriated drivers). The applicant concurs with these requirements. Police Calls for Service Staff requested Calls for Service data1'1 from the Pleasanton Police Department between 2015 and 2018 at the project site. The data included a variety of reported incidents. The data showed a total of four service calls related to "robbery" over a four-year span at the existing [1] Calls for Service is a phone call log listing the number of calls that the Police Department receives. The nearest site address may be used to identify the location, which may not be the actual location of the reported incident. PUD-134/P18-0332/P18-0334 Planning Commission Page 16 of 24