DRAFT Arborist Report
<br /> 4108 Foothill Road
<br /> Pleasanton, CA
<br /> Introduction and Overview
<br /> Mr. Chashmawala is proposing to develop the property located at 4108 Foothill Rd., in
<br /> Pleasanton, CA. The property is an undeveloped lot situated on a slope with native oaks.
<br /> HortScience I Bartlett Consulting (Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company)was asked
<br /> to prepare an Arborist Report for the site as part of the development application to the City of
<br /> Pleasanton.
<br /> This report provides the following information:
<br /> 1. An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees based on a visual
<br /> inspection from the ground.
<br /> 2. An assessment of the development impacts to the trees based on the drawings provided
<br /> by the client.
<br /> 3. The estimated value of the trees according to the procedures described in the Guide for
<br /> Plant Appraisal(Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers).
<br /> 4. Guidelines for tree preservation during the design, construction and maintenance phases
<br /> of development.
<br /> Assessment Methods
<br /> Trees were assessed on May 14, 2019. Since the trees had been tagged in the past, we used
<br /> the existing tag numbers, which are non-sequential. The assessment included all trees within
<br /> and adjacent to proposed construction areas measuring 6" and greater in diameter. The
<br /> assessment procedure consisted of the following steps:
<br /> 1. Identifying the species of tree;
<br /> 2. Tagging each tree with a numerically coded metal tag and recording its location on a
<br /> map;
<br /> 3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54" above grade;
<br /> 4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 —5:
<br /> 5-A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, with
<br /> good structure and form typical of the species.
<br /> 4-Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural
<br /> defects that could be corrected.
<br /> 3-Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of
<br /> crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated with
<br /> regular care.
<br /> 2-Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large
<br /> branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated.
<br /> 1 -Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of foliage
<br /> from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated.
<br /> 5. Rating the suitability for preservation as"high", "moderate" or"low". Suitability for
<br /> preservation considers the health, age and structural condition of the tree species,
<br /> and its potential to remain an asset to the site.
<br /> High: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the potential
<br /> for longevity at the site.
<br /> Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects than
<br /> can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more intense
<br /> management and monitoring, and may have shorter life span than
<br /> those in 'high' category.
<br /> Low: Trees in poor health or with significant structural defects that cannot
<br /> be mitigated. Tree is expected to continue to decline, regardless of
<br /> treatment. The species or individual tree may have characteristics
<br /> that are undesirable for landscapes, and generally are unsuited for
<br /> use areas.
<br />sion
<br /> Page 11 of 12
<br /> Planning Commission
<br /> Page 6 of 12
<br />neer;
<br /> b. Show construction vehicles and equipment parking area, materials storage, temporary
<br /> fencing, construction trailer location, and construction contractors/workers parking
<br /> area.
<br /> P19-0059 Planning Commission
<br /> Page 5of12
<br />-0059 Planning Commission
<br /> Page 4 of 12
<br /> LUXti11 a I.L -
<br /> �[ ,443_1:8,,...i1,...'3'--,14445.5-41'0-11_14.22: . '
<br /> ry" 0 �1 202- F�:. �,� P 43017 AI i l)43! 1, ,406! 11.410r411:051_13121-14_4814511
<br /> � 145 ,423 i _�1533 1h`�
<br /> t• m 3 R A L� .. .. _ 1 t / - ,4� 1-- �]4`Y9_+1 1418 1411i1-Q
<br /> ,r. F 'v 2oas } ?' r ( v S I a -T 1 14011 �.J45, i 1414 1415 1535:.:,1527 1 1
<br /> l�I I I 1 it :;f':).i''.407 1520
<br /> ,.4 �� 1 1.148 �, 1515 1x45'
<br /> VALLEY A V ' itr,� D I '� 512 505
<br /> W 993 _ '� .a / , e s`' 1193
<br /> $+_ _
<br /> 1993 ,. 1 - 1 6 \ a g
<br /> Wy ,93 a '
<br /> ,95, RROU!<:1>;IZCF��ti'rY - kTII � M \ 1795 \'797
<br /> yl 1a1/ 1944
<br /> e
<br /> b 1787 v
<br /> • ISI i�
<br /> 939 . - j_____IL".:::::i
<br /> e ,,� �,�
<br /> w• 1965 1952 J \ _ 18gi ,alli3 '�, °n
<br /> n
<br /> ,92. ''4
<br /> „e01
<br /> glaY16.8 �,—� J I ” 0 1
<br /> 83q a i
<br /> 1863 ry , _, ..J
<br /> �iliY.tSchool Q ,90+ -„ ,860.,:-'� ,ems ,�� ^< !� "".� m 1.183 � 3� _ 1734 1638 ,1544 1536 15
<br /> 8x9 ,s„ m '924
<br /> t ,62
<br /> 1265 1
<br /> 44
<br /> m
<br /> ,sea =�=J_ I
<br /> .
<br /> 1 '
<br /> 976 m i 5 , laoe i ,Y U I Et 8
<br /> 979 e `
<br /> ,961 1614 r.,, ,-44 N +947 J � 11 - -
<br /> a +
<br /> C ice
<br /> I 1 I�I \ ��. ��N( I.w�U Si
<br /> ,8315 15,0 ,®7 ,926 � 19215 1967 } 1554 i �
<br /> 1 311
<br /> — 51,1171
<br /> '4 '14p RAN
<br /> 5y�� a q ty
<br /> 1885 180' 1805 1606 1841 1995 i 1992 J v : 17 A �1 b w' 'd1 ' a "' €y 7n R
<br /> MSS` 2 1 `"
<br /> . :id_AmLL)A I)u - 1 ' S: ei - 4 'iA 9 c/1
<br /> m 8 4
<br /> �)� .'- W 1495 1198 ,795 :66
<br /> ,789116991800 = 4 .f__+^ _s i \ _.
<br /> ` - zI. I ).`I.r 1��, �+ C1wti UY 11'Yv64LL:'1++. 615, N1n1 .7:z, 149:1; 2 1n5 16,1 ,�.,eCOITtiTlUltit�' i . c i » S q 0 8 0 S t 4.-. r:tiM. f\ 40U730 173 a 1772 1750 rr 1757 17� 1781 1761 1613 151 Z j"'r`"" 14. ' N ,� �' _ n g o
<br /> 1:4,500 V P
<br /> o 0.05 0.1 mi P19-0140, 1809 Santa Rita Rd. Suite A & B, Hill
<br /> Planning Division
<br /> , i i July 30,2019
<br /> FL£ NTON.
<br /> o 280 560 Feet
<br /> |