PROJECT SITE ALTERNATIVES
<br /> The subject parcel is a legally created lot zoned for residential uses. The proposed residence
<br /> meets the intent of the underlying zoning designation. Alternatives include:
<br /> 1. Approve the project with a modified house design, height, size, etc.
<br /> While Alternative 1 would result in a residence with reduced height and mass, the zoning
<br /> allows two-story residences and the height can be permitted as proposed. Moreover, the
<br /> proposed residence's large setbacks, extensive landscaping, horizontal character, and
<br /> articulated building design help mitigate the building height and mass. The proposed project
<br /> represents a reasonable development scenario for the site and as such, staff does not
<br /> recommend the alternative.
<br /> PROS AND CONS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
<br /> Pros Cons
<br /> One additional housing unit which will Adds a new structure to the lot which will be
<br /> increase the City's supply of market rate visible to the surrounding neighbors until the
<br /> housing. proposed landscaping matures.
<br /> Allows appropriate development on a
<br /> property zoned for a residential use.
<br /> Significant and enhanced landscaping along
<br /> the project frontage and rear and side yards
<br /> would soften the appearance and reduce
<br /> visual impacts of the new home.
<br /> DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS
<br /> The Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 18.20 sets forth the criteria to be addressed in
<br /> reviewing a Design Review application. These criteria are set forth in the draft Resolution
<br /> included as Exhibit A, and includes preservation of natural beauty, relationship of the
<br /> residence with the streetscape and surroundings, compatibility of architecture, among other
<br /> criteria. As described in Exhibit A, and based on the information and analysis provided in this
<br /> Agenda Report, staff recommends the Commission make the required findings to approve the
<br /> project.
<br /> PUBLIC NOTICE
<br /> Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a
<br /> 1,000-foot radius of the site and published in the newspaper. At the time this report was
<br /> published, staff has not received any public comments.
<br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
<br /> The City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for PUD-87-19 pursuant to
<br /> the requirements of CEQA; the MND included mitigation measures which would be required to
<br /> be implemented by the subject application, and which would reduce potential project impacts
<br /> to a less than significant level. These measures are included as Conditions of Approval for the
<br /> subject application.
<br /> P19-0059, 4108 Foothill Rd. Planning Commission
<br /> 11 of 12
<br /> P19-0059, 4108 Foothill Rd. Planning Commission
<br /> 4 of 12
<br /> 430pm-930pm
<br /> P:Administative materialRLists(contact info,ID*,Account MA/alley Plaza Tenant List 4/23/2019
<br />1I.V• Q'Q,��@ (- i
<br /> /i Y
<br /> ,:. 2122 " + 2w. v v g'1 '! 1 s 117 - '�:.i.A 1ffi3- 1¢92 ,,�''2'
<br /> y '__� }—... '„2- 91 .1.19� `2ri-_Ia9-' 1 ik i ' v0
<br /> Qi P v 16 i 11.0..., _',..S- Y.".. `/
<br /> pow 7 �s+� 4 p¢'3g� �`n,,�.�tk�y LS
<br /> a m O (UkairfeCea '9;5
<br /> • < v.
<br /> N .y^ 3'> R3 A 7 203) 1.7 - 111 01 ,03 \ -
<br /> f
<br /> J 1 -
<br /> 1 61
<br /> ' I�' tr� C o l 3� *I 3 l Lr 1907 ' r t ) , ,
<br /> �i , 20+- 19, 1. rr14:?-5111-11-1,1I
<br /> 1 ,f a > e r'cJ- 11 I -h.
<br /> • .1, ,,, a�! m ( e I o ,++ '�"• 71 1118 14-2_11_11:33.1"-± i 136,4
<br /> 6-: h�'
<br /> n, ,,, A 41, cv tz 204: 181" f 1 Ym, r1 190.3 I '' in ��? 11 142y 141-4-, _1117 i ,447 1431 1560 � 0....s..11
<br /> v $ 43q� ,410 ,413) 427 :,..,„,61665.,,, f
<br /> ,g' LUXti11 a I.L -
<br /> �[ ,443_1:8,,...i1,...'3'--,14445.5-41'0-11_14.22: . '
<br /> ry" 0 �1 202- F�:. �,� P 43017 AI i l)43! 1, ,406! 11.410r411:051_13121-14_4814511
<br /> � 145 ,423 i _�1533 1h`�
<br /> t• m 3 R A L� .. .. _ 1 t / - ,4� 1-- �]4`Y9_+1 1418 1411i1-Q
<br /> ,r. F 'v 2oas } ?' r ( v S I a -T 1 14011 �.J45, i 1414 1415 1535:.:,1527 1 1
<br /> l�I I I 1 it :;f':).i''.407 1520
<br /> ,.4 �� 1 1.148 �, 1515 1x45'
<br /> VALLEY A V ' itr,� D I '� 512 505
<br /> W 993 _ '� .a / , e s`' 1193
<br /> $+_ _
<br /> 1993 ,. 1 - 1 6 \ a g
<br /> Wy ,93 a '
<br /> ,95, RROU!<:1>;IZCF��ti'rY - kTII � M \ 1795 \'797
<br /> yl 1a1/ 1944
<br /> e
<br /> b 1787 v
<br /> • ISI i�
<br /> 939 . - j_____IL".:::::i
<br /> e ,,� �,�
<br /> w• 1965 1952 J \ _ 18gi ,alli3 '�, °n
<br /> n
<br /> ,92. ''4
<br /> „e01
<br /> glaY16.8 �,—� J I ” 0 1
<br /> 83q a i
<br /> 1863 ry , _, ..J
<br /> �iliY.tSchool Q ,90+ -„ ,860.,:-'� ,ems ,�� ^< !� "".� m 1.183 � 3� _ 1734 1638 ,1544 1536 15
<br /> 8x9 ,s„ m '924
<br /> t ,62
<br /> 1265 1
<br /> 44
<br /> m
<br /> ,sea =�=J_ I
<br /> .
<br /> 1 '
<br /> 976 m i 5 , laoe i ,Y U I Et 8
<br /> 979 e `
<br /> ,961 1614 r.,, ,-44 N +947 J � 11 - -
<br /> a +
<br /> C ice
<br /> I 1 I�I \ ��. ��N( I.w�U Si
<br /> ,8315 15,0 ,®7 ,926 � 19215 1967 } 1554 i �
<br /> 1 311
<br /> — 51,1171
<br /> '4 '14p RAN
<br /> 5y�� a q ty
<br /> 1885 180' 1805 1606 1841 1995 i 1992 J v : 17 A �1 b w' 'd1 ' a "' €y 7n R
<br /> MSS` 2 1 `"
<br /> . :id_AmLL)A I)u - 1 ' S: ei - 4 'iA 9 c/1
<br /> m 8 4
<br /> �)� .'- W 1495 1198 ,795 :66
<br /> ,789116991800 = 4 .f__+^ _s i \ _.
<br /> ` - zI. I ).`I.r 1��, �+ C1wti UY 11'Yv64LL:'1++. 615, N1n1 .7:z, 149:1; 2 1n5 16,1 ,�.,eCOITtiTlUltit�' i . c i » S q 0 8 0 S t 4.-. r:tiM. f\ 40U730 173 a 1772 1750 rr 1757 17� 1781 1761 1613 151 Z j"'r`"" 14. ' N ,� �' _ n g o
<br /> 1:4,500 V P
<br /> o 0.05 0.1 mi P19-0140, 1809 Santa Rita Rd. Suite A & B, Hill
<br /> Planning Division
<br /> , i i July 30,2019
<br /> FL£ NTON.
<br /> o 280 560 Feet
<br /> |