|
Fi•ure 1: Aerial Photo•ra•h of the Estates on Oak Rid•e Subdivision and Lot 6
<br /> ' /, „ .., �, -
<br /> a ..`
<br /> .. w t
<br /> "..... '4— fr.:. 001: ., .„ _ "1,4,„ . _ '7
<br /> 1 x
<br /> '�" of 6 , N# ' . :'fi
<br /> 7t_ ; '',?,t
<br /> Subject Lot Estates o"` ` q 5',-. - '-. 4. ' ,'
<br /> SIAM s w- "`~
<br /> ,,
<br /> Jd
<br /> y
<br /> t..'+s - ,' ,. V '�ma tea,+
<br /> Fi•ure 2: Lot 6 Plot Plan
<br /> '�fip ` ! r 1 1 i 11 ` �� 1p`�``�rr ----; ��► Ali
<br /> l �, � �` k ,\\'‘ '
<br /> ` � \ + LOT k\,, lam/ ��"' '�� � \1�\t pi 3.'00�' � `�;,..;_____________.----;„„_,,,,,,/
<br /> ��/���// , \ `��. •�+(,,4,\ . 1\\ ,556 w- \___--��� 1J
<br /> ia000e
<br /> I it awl
<br /> if
<br /> (' w •' Designated 03.111
<br /> -,ic.„67 '�,.,.�
<br /> j,� �\� f ;1\ V I r DevelopmentArea i'e%:+ '=.;�` .,. �s
<br /> 1 (, ' \‘_�1�1 r�� I , \v,,,,",. �_. - r=f .} _,,,..11._.„.
<br /> TA*14,7.44. ' • ---'-' `' ,,''' -4"fti -rusgi=oe . --....,,X.,t,,,
<br /> '' tCity .- �' ��;� _�.�- /, r z �, D k, w
<br /> 4
<br /> 1
<br /> ,i,-.\ 1 Water ��� Vit..\ /./ �`�����r �� Tank �•.,, \\\ �IR / N. (((itreet,
<br /> 1 ;' y At
<br /> PROPOSED PROJECT
<br /> The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct an approximately
<br /> 4,300-square-foot single-story residence with an approximately 825-square-foot attached
<br /> garage (see the partial Site Plan in Figure 3). Table 1 (on the following page) summarizes the
<br /> prescribed development standards for new construction as prescribed in the Estates on Oak
<br /> Ridge Architectural Design Guidelines and provides a comparison of the subject proposal to
<br /> those standards.
<br /> P19-0092, 6 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission
<br /> 3 of 9
<br />part of the PUD-54 approval (see Plan Sheet L-103 of Exhibit B.) Residential
<br /> and/or open space areas generally surround the subject lot in all directions. Figure 1 shows an
<br /> aerial photograph of the subject lot, and Figure 2 shows the subject lot's plot plan, along with
<br /> the location of the DDA and City water tank.
<br /> P19-0092, 6 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission
<br /> 2 of 9
<br />s controversy on the items in
<br /> terms of how they would be written up. She also cited the fact that a new Planning
<br /> Commissioner was not involved with the Task Force and this meeting and it may cause a
<br /> "restart" issue.
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 24 of 27 June 26, 2019
<br />umber of steps, but it requires a very
<br /> collaborative effort and team approach, and City Council has a challenging task to reconcile
<br /> multiple demands. The idea to have a Task Force or smaller group to work on the parking
<br /> issue means people need to come to it with the willingness to look at things beyond just adding
<br /> supply two years from now through a parking structure.
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 23 of 27 June 26, 2019
<br />presented, stating the PDA Vitality
<br /> Committee began meeting and red-lining the 2002 DSP in 2013. They provided it to staff in
<br /> 2014 and have been awaiting this process. She said although there have been wins, there
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019
<br />
|