Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Ritter questioned what is prohibiting them from saying the PDA, the Chamber of <br /> Commerce and downtown business need to create their own task force and that it not be City <br /> led, and that this group take recommendations and bring them forward to the City. <br /> Mr. Beaudin said he was not opposed to working with a group like that towards solutions, but <br /> supply is not the only factor in the equation. There is a parking management issue, as well. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he does not disagree with these comments surrounding parking and <br /> downtown. If part of it goes forward, he asked what else could be done to revitalize and keep <br /> the downtown alive, with new restaurants and shopping coming in. This is what he was <br /> referred to as Plan B at the last meeting. The plan as written has some good proposals for <br /> what to do with this site, but there is no Plan B. He suggested being clear to the City Council <br /> that the Downtown Specific Plan has some great recommendations and they should not be <br /> abandoned, but the work product is incomplete and there needs to be some combined City / <br /> public / commercial collaboration to come up with an actionable plan that is viable. <br /> Commissioner Ritter seconded Commissioner Brown's recommendation. <br /> Chair Allen stated she fully supports this, as well. The assumption of the plan was that they <br /> would have a civic center. The community and Chamber of Commerce have been weighing in <br /> and if they do not have a civic center they have not truly addressed parking in the plan so it is <br /> a major gap. <br /> ACTION: There was unanimous consensus of the Planning Commission to recommend <br /> the creation of a small working group (potentially with the Pleasanton Downtown <br /> Association and the Chamber of Commerce) to improve parking supply and <br /> management and establish a timeline for implementation. <br /> The Planning Commissioners agreed that they would not vote "no" on the specific plan solely <br /> because the parking topic was incomplete, but that this was a significant piece in public <br /> opinion that needs to get addressed. <br /> Chair Allen asked if there were remaining items, and there were none. <br /> Commissioner Ritter asked if this will be brought back with updates to approve it and move <br /> forward to the City Council. <br /> Mr. Beaudin stated the Planning Commission could take this action if ready tonight or continue <br /> the item to the next meeting. <br /> Commissioner Ritter suggested seeing the changes, summarized as a workshop and returned <br /> when there is the fourth Commissioner present for final recommendation. <br /> Chair Allen stated it could be continued but did not feel there was controversy on the items in <br /> terms of how they would be written up. She also cited the fact that a new Planning <br /> Commissioner was not involved with the Task Force and this meeting and it may cause a <br /> "restart" issue. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 24 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />umber of steps, but it requires a very <br /> collaborative effort and team approach, and City Council has a challenging task to reconcile <br /> multiple demands. The idea to have a Task Force or smaller group to work on the parking <br /> issue means people need to come to it with the willingness to look at things beyond just adding <br /> supply two years from now through a parking structure. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 23 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />presented, stating the PDA Vitality <br /> Committee began meeting and red-lining the 2002 DSP in 2013. They provided it to staff in <br /> 2014 and have been awaiting this process. She said although there have been wins, there <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />