Laserfiche WebLink
ACTION: There was unanimous consensus of the Planning Commission to modify <br /> policy LD.P-49 to say, "upgrade existing residential buildings and landscaping on the <br /> same property as part of new residential infill projects." <br /> Parking: <br /> Commissioner Brown said throughout the 18-month process the DSP was supposed to <br /> address parking. He respects staff's opinion that it is addressed in the parking plan adopted by <br /> the City Council, but the Task Force has failed in that endeavor of addressing it. He tried to <br /> sway his colleagues at the last Task Force meeting but failed to get consensus. He asked that <br /> as part of the Planning Commission's recommendation there be a side recommendation for a <br /> subcommittee or Task Force to discuss parking in the downtown with the sole purpose of <br /> making recommendations to the City Council to amend the adopted parking plan. This would <br /> be his counter-proposal and he would be in favor of clear language to the City Council as to <br /> recommending that part of the plan is incomplete, and does not want to take the advice of <br /> some to simply vote no on the entire plan since there are many good things in it. <br /> Commissioner Ritter commented that there does not appear to be an implementation of the <br /> Parking Plan. <br /> Chair Allen and Commissioner Ritter agreed, and the Planning Commission briefly discussed <br /> scenarios relating to parking apps and related ideas for amendments to the parking plan. <br /> Commissioner Brown commented that he is a proponent of needing a timetable in regard to <br /> parking and coming to some relief aside from resizing parking spaces. <br /> Mr. Beaudin referred to page 79 in the plan MP-P.33; the Parking Strategy Implementation <br /> Plan. He referred to the Transportation Corridor and said the City Council discussed the design <br /> last week. He also mentioned the effort must be multi-faceted to address parking, and that one <br /> of the most straight-forward ways to address parking is to introduce paid parking but this was <br /> ruled out in the Downtown Parking Strategy Implementation Plan. <br /> Currently, the Alameda County Fair is taking place and employees cannot even get a parking <br /> spot in the City Hall parking lot, and it is not a normal time to find parking in downtown <br /> Pleasanton. There is a parking structure contemplated in this planning effort. It comes with <br /> redevelopment of the Civic Center site and with investment from Altamont Commuter Express <br /> (ACE) and a three or more-party agreement to build the parking structure. <br /> Lastly, Mr. Beaudin said on page 79 is a list of things and everyone wants to see more parking <br /> built. It is the most expensive and takes the longest. Tomorrow, employees that work <br /> downtown can park in strategic locations so parking supply is available for people to come and <br /> eat lunch or shop. It is not something anyone has wanted to take on for the commercial side, <br /> but it is something we can do tomorrow. There are a number of steps, but it requires a very <br /> collaborative effort and team approach, and City Council has a challenging task to reconcile <br /> multiple demands. The idea to have a Task Force or smaller group to work on the parking <br /> issue means people need to come to it with the willingness to look at things beyond just adding <br /> supply two years from now through a parking structure. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 23 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />presented, stating the PDA Vitality <br /> Committee began meeting and red-lining the 2002 DSP in 2013. They provided it to staff in <br /> 2014 and have been awaiting this process. She said although there have been wins, there <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019 <br />