Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT J: PUBLIC COMMENTS �L_Pi- pSANTp <br /> DOWN Tt sWN'S('E•'[FIC ct AP4 UPOME <br /> From: Beverly Gill <br /> Sent: Friday,June 07, 2019 8:30 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Subject: Downtown Development <br /> Mayor and City Council, <br /> Thank you for supporting the two-story limit on new construction downtown. Thank you,too, for <br /> promoting the limitation of downtown residential units. Main Street should be lined with cafes, shops, <br /> and other commercial businesses.There are plenty of other sites in our town for residential units. Keep <br /> downtown quaint and encourage our citizens to make it a destination for relaxation and fun. This area <br /> should not become residential. <br /> Buildings in the downtown historic district should not exceed two stories. Keep this area to a small <br /> scale, providing visitors a sense of charm and nostalgia. <br /> With respect to the Barone property, it should remain a business at the street level, while the remaining <br /> land could become partially residential. However, if Pleasanton is ever going to enjoy the Arroyo as a <br /> community, a swath of land will need to be reserved for a possible promenade or walking path. <br /> Moving on to the topic of the corner of First Street and Vineyard Avenue, please allow the Safreno <br /> property to be zoned residential, with a limit of two stories for homes built there. Beautiful craftsman <br /> townhomes in the style of those on Peters would be most welcomed and would be an asset to the <br /> community. Rental apartments, however, would not be as desireable in this location. Vineyard Avenue <br /> is in need of upgrading. A thoughtfully and attractively designed group of owner-occupied homes on <br /> that corner would make a remarkable difference to those of us living in this part of town! <br /> Please do not succumb to pressures from developers and special interest groups. Listen to the voting <br /> residents. We want to retain our special, small scale, and sweet downtown! <br /> Your decisions make a difference for all of us today and for generations to come. Your responsibility is <br /> great. <br /> Responses are welcomed. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Beverly Gill <br /> Prepared for the June 26, 2019, Planning Commission Meeting 2 <br />urn proposed. City shall Traffic <br /> queues are projected to require payments of Engineering <br /> exceed the available Transportation Division <br /> storage.The addition of Impact Fees as <br /> the Proposed Plan traffic applicable. <br /> would increase the <br /> 10 <br />l project-related mitigation measures. <br />ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed <br /> Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in <br /> the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). <br /> The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental <br /> impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. <br /> Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that <br /> significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible <br /> mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, <br /> as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of <br /> the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated <br /> herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that <br /> warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby <br /> justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. <br /> 27 <br />would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 <br /> MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared <br /> to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's <br /> emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the <br /> 26 <br />ntal <br /> 24 <br />iteria air pollutants <br /> 23 <br />