2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing of Responsibility for Verification Complete Verification Verification Date Initial eastbound left-turn queue by more than 25 feet during the both peak hours. The addition of TRA-4: Retime traffic signal. Monitor conditions Ongoing City of Proposed Plan traffic through applicant Pleasanton would result in vehicle traffic studies as Community queues at the development Development intersection of First projects are Department, Street at Ray proposed. City shall Traffic Street/Vineyard Avenue require payments of Engineering to extend beyond the Transportation Division available storage in the Impact Fees as AM peak hour in the applicable. existing With Project condition. The addition of the TRA-5: Retime traffic signal and Monitor conditions Ongoing City of Proposed Plan traffic extend the eastbound left-turn by 30 through applicant Pleasanton would result in vehicle feet. traffic studies as Community queues at the development Development intersection of First projects are Department, Street at Neal Street to proposed. City shall Traffic extend beyond the require payments of Engineering available storage in the Transportation Division PM peak hour. Impact Fees as applicable. The addition of the TRA-6: Extend the length of the Monitor conditions Ongoing City of Proposed Plan traffic eastbound left-turn pocket to provide through applicant Pleasanton would result in vehicle 275 feet of vehicle storage. traffic studies as Community queues at the development Development intersection of Case projects are Department, Avenue/Old Bernal proposed. City shall Traffic Avenue at Bernal require payments of II s are Department, and southbound left-turn proposed. City shall Traffic queues are projected to require payments of Engineering exceed the available Transportation Division storage.The addition of Impact Fees as the Proposed Plan traffic applicable. would increase the 10 l project-related mitigation measures. ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. 27 would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the 26 ntal 24 iteria air pollutants 23