2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing of Responsibility for Verification Complete Verification Verification Date Initial The addition of TRA-2:Stripe a northbound and Monitor conditions Ongoing City of Proposed Plan traffic southbound left-turn pocket at the through applicant Pleasanton would deteriorate the intersection to mitigate the impact in traffic studies as Community overall LOS from LOS C the existing and near-term.To mitigate development Development in the PM peak hour to the cumulative impact,the City would projects are Department, LOS F at the signalize the intersection, in addition to proposed. Require Traffic intersection of Peters the restriping identified as an existing payments of Engineering Avenue at St. Mary and near-term mitigation. Transportation Division Street,as well as worsen Development in the planning area Impact Fees as the operations of a should contribute a fair share towards applicable. controlled movement by this improvement.This improvement is increasing delay by more not in the TIF. Should this improvement than 30-seconds. be added to the TIF, payment of the City's TIF would constitute a fair share payment. The potential for restriping should be evaluated against the Proposed Plan to provide a cycle track on Peters Avenue. If there is not sufficient right-of-way to provide left-turn pockets and a cycle track, then the existing and near-term mitigation is to signalize the intersection. When the intersection TRA-3:Signalize the intersection and Monitor conditions Ongoing City of of Bernal Avenue at modify the eastbound and southbound through applicant Pleasanton Main Street is signalized left-turn pockets to accommodate the traffic studies as Community in the cumulative projected vehicle queues. development Development condition,the eastbound projects are Department, and southbound left-turn proposed. City shall Traffic queues are projected to require payments of Engineering exceed the available Transportation Division storage.The addition of Impact Fees as the Proposed Plan traffic applicable. would increase the 10 l project-related mitigation measures. ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. 27 would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the 26 ntal 24 iteria air pollutants 23