My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2_Exhibits A-C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-26
>
2_Exhibits A-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 3:20:49 PM
Creation date
6/14/2019 3:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
Document Relationships
2
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\06-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Task Force Recommendation <br /> The Task Force moved and voted to support a maximum height of 40-feet for C-C and MU-T <br /> Zoning Districts and a maximum of 46-feet in the MU-D Zoning District. This would remove <br /> the height limit of 30-feet in PUDs. Additionally, to support a FAR of 300-percent in all <br /> districts (6 in support, 3 in opposition). <br /> Other Policy Revisions <br /> Staff noted that there were additional policy recommendations listed in the agenda packet. <br /> The Task Force provided no additional feedback or comments on the "other" policy <br /> revisions. <br /> B. Task Force Direction, Comments, and Questions <br /> The Task Force did not provide any additional comments, direction, or questions. <br /> C. Public Comments and Questions <br /> The public did not provide any additional comments, direction, or questions. <br /> 4. Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> The City's consultant outlined the timeline/process of the draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> (DEIR) to-date including publishing date, comment period, and next steps. The consultant <br /> stated the document is available on the website or City offices and briefly outlined the contents <br /> of the DEIR. To note, the key findings included significant impacts in three areas that could be <br /> mitigated to levels of less than significance through mitigation measures and found three <br /> significant and unavoidable impacts. That is, even when all mitigation measures are <br /> incorporated will remain. The DEIR also included alternatives to the project. <br /> Following the close of the public comment period, a Final EIR will be prepared and distributed <br /> and there will be additional opportunities for public comment that time. <br /> Public Comments and Questions <br /> At this time, there were no questions or comments from the public on the EIR. There was a <br /> public comment noting the need for additional public involvement and to slow down the process <br /> to take in all of the changes and get public involvement in the Plan and EIR. Staff commented <br /> the EIR will also be reviewed at the Planning Commission on March 13 and we will continue to <br /> accept comments via phone, email, or mail through March 18. Ultimately, a Final EIR will be put <br /> together and brought through the public hearing process. <br /> Task Force Direction, Comments, and Questions <br /> The Task Force noted that under Air Quality, there should be a mitigation to include electric <br /> vehicle charging (which may be a policy in the plan or mitigation in the EIR). <br /> 6. Task Force Check-In <br /> At this time, there were no additional comments. <br /> 6. Brief Announcements from Task Force and Staff, Summary and Next Steps <br /> A. Summary of the Meeting and Review of Next Meeting Topics <br /> Staff provided an overview of the Task Force's progress and upcoming schedule. <br /> The meeting was adjourned at 9:05pm <br /> Summary of February 26, 2019 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 7 of 7 <br />e reduced through the design. Additionally, there will be additional public review for the <br /> design of these new buildings. It was noted the overall building height in PUD's to be 30-feet <br /> which may need to be removed if the goal is to allow additional flexibility in PUDs. <br /> Public Comments and Questions <br /> The Task Force opened up the meeting to the public. Three members from the public <br /> provided comments. One comment noted we should maximize value and volume of use we <br /> can get on the land of this downtown (MU-D) area. Construction today tends to have higher <br /> plate heights and limited this area to 40-feet will only yield two-stories and really restrict any <br /> additional height/floors. However, given the right location and design, the Council may want <br /> to allow three-stories in some instances. Another comment agrees with the Task Force <br /> recommendation in terms of allowing additional heights so the projects can be reviewed on <br /> an individual basis. The final comment requested the note about limiting PUDs to 30-feet be <br /> stricken from the DSP to allow additional flexibility especially given modern construction. <br /> Summary of February 26, 2019 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 6 of 7 <br />c Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 5 of 7 <br />