My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2_Exhibits A-C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-26
>
2_Exhibits A-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 3:20:49 PM
Creation date
6/14/2019 3:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
Document Relationships
2
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\06-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Street-Fronting Residential Entries: Permitted on Main Street. but should be <br /> designed to minimize their prominence, as outlined in the recommendation. <br /> • On-Site Ground Floor Parking for Residential Uses: Permitted in all districts, <br /> provided that it does not include habitable space. <br /> • Right-to-do-Business Ordinance: Use other methods (i.e project conditions of <br /> approval) to address potential conflicts between downtown residential and <br /> commercial uses. <br /> Development Standards. The City Council provided the following direction with respect <br /> to development standards within various land use districts: <br /> • Mixed Use-Downtown: Height: 46-foot maximum height. and a maximum of 3 <br /> stories; Floor Area Ratio: 300 percent. <br /> • Mixed Use-Transitional: Height: 36-foot maximum with a maximum of 2 stories; <br /> Floor Area Ratio: 125 percent. <br /> • Downtown Commercial: Height: 40-foot maximum; Floor Area Ratio: 300 percent, <br /> consistent with the existing development standards. <br /> • Residential Height Limits: 30 feet maximum. with the ability to consider additional <br /> height through a Planned Unit Development (PUD). <br /> Private Property Owner Initiated Requests. The City Council also considered whether <br /> and how requests for changes in land use designation made by two individual property <br /> owners (4212 First Street (Shell Station property). and 475/493 St. John Street <br /> (Barone's property)) should be incorporated into the DSP update process. After <br /> discussion, on a 2-3 vote the City Council rejected a motion to include the properties <br /> among land use map changes to be adopted with the Specific Plan. Following the vote, <br /> Councilmember Narum. who was among the three Councilmembers voting in the <br /> majority, requested the opportunity to reconsider her vote at the next City Council <br /> meeting. Discussion of this item is therefore provided below <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Property Owner-Initiated Land Use Requests <br /> During the Council's April 16 discussion. staff was questioned about how the two <br /> properties (4212 First Street and 475/493 St. John Street) would be re-designated in the <br /> Specific Plan, the relationship of that action to other actions, such as rezoning, and to <br /> required CEQA review, and the related question of density assumptions for the two <br /> sites. <br /> Specific Plan Amendment <br /> If the Council were to support inclusion of the requested land use changes in the DSP, <br /> staff recommended doing so by including an annotation or other map notation for each <br /> property on the DSP Land Use Diagram (Figure 4-2) to indicate the possibility of being <br /> allowed to proceed with a residential-only project. in addition to the commercial and <br /> mixed-use options available in the current DSP. The notation and a related policy would <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />ding owner- <br /> initiated land use requests. Motion failed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmember Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Testa <br /> Absent: None <br /> In response to Mayor Thorne's question regarding the conclusion regarding this matter, Director of <br /> Community Development Beaudin reported they will need to submit their applications, go through the <br /> process of changing the Specific Plan and do their own environmental review. <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 7 of 8 <br />er site, adding residential to <br /> downtown commercial properties. <br /> Director of Community Development Beaudin asked whether Council would support parking on the <br /> ground level for self-parked residential. <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 5 of 8 <br />ide; felt a small residential development would generate fewer vehicle trips <br /> than the gas station; and urged Council to support staffs recommendations. <br /> Mayor Thorne closed the public hearing. <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 4 of 8 <br /> the original <br /> proposal and the draft plan. She stated people have a sense of pride in the downtown area because of <br /> its quaint, small-town feel and spoke in opposition to adding residential there. She urged Council to <br /> consider a plan where everybody can continue to be proud of downtown. <br /> Laureen Green referenced a letter she submitted to the City and felt the survey and felt the plan has <br /> diverted from it. <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 3 of 8 <br />g and the State's intent on reducing costs <br /> and staff has not reduced or waived parking requirements as part of this update. He added that under <br /> SB 50, the corresponding issue will be the BART Station. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 2 of 8 <br /> residential units in the back, <br /> Director of Community Development Beaudin reported there is a policy in the draft plan that prohibits <br /> new curb cuts and staff will ensure access is provided without impacting Main Street. In reply to <br /> Excerpt: City Council Minutes, April 16, 2019 Page 1 of 8 <br />