Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE 21 <br /> or service. As demonstrated in this Report,each parcel in the Maintenance District receives <br /> a direct advantage and special benefit from the Improvements. <br /> In the Maintenance District,the advantage that each parcel receives from the Improvements <br /> is direct, and the boundaries are narrowly drawn to include only parcels that benefit from the <br /> Assessment. Therefore, the even spread of assessment throughout the narrowly drawn <br /> district is indeed consistent with the SVTA decision. The benefits from the Improvements <br /> within the Maintenance District do not vary further based on proximity of the parcels to the <br /> Improvements because the increased benefits of greater proximity to the Improvements are <br /> generally offset by a parallel increase in negative factors such as higher levels of traffic, <br /> noise, etc. that comes with increased proximity. <br /> Consequently, since all parcels in the Maintenance District have good access and proximity <br /> to the Improvements and the benefits to relatively closer proximity are offset by other factors, <br /> additional proximity is not considered to be a factor in determining benefit within the <br /> Maintenance District. Therefore, zones of benefit are not justified or needed within the <br /> Maintenance District. <br /> METHOD OF ASSESSMENT <br /> As previously discussed, the Assessments provide comprehensive Improvements that <br /> clearly confers direct and special benefits to properties in the Maintenance District. <br /> The allocation of special benefits to property is primarily based on the type of property and <br /> the size of property. These benefits can also partially be measured by the occupants on <br /> property in the Maintenance District because such parcel population density is a measure <br /> of the relative benefit a parcel receives from the Improvements. It should be noted that many <br /> other types of"traditional"assessments also use parcel population densities to apportion the <br /> assessments. For example, the assessments for sewer systems, roads and water systems <br /> are typically allocated based on the population density of the parcels assessed. Therefore, <br /> the apportionment of benefit is reasonably based on the type of parcel, the size of parcels <br /> and the population density of parcels. <br /> A critical step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for <br /> each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each <br /> property in relation to a single family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family <br /> Equivalent(SFE) units. This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments <br /> in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis <br /> for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer's <br /> Report, all properties are designated an SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit <br /> in relation to a single family home on one parcel. In this case, the "benchmark" property is <br /> the single family detached dwelling which is one Single Family Equivalent unit or one SFE. <br /> Finally,the special benefits to be derived from the Assessments will be conferred on property <br /> and are not based on a specific property owner's use of the Improvements, a specific <br /> property owner's occupancy of property, or the property owner's demographic status such <br /> Cm of PLEASANTON <br /> LIGHTING&LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1993-1,WINDSOR SC IConsultingGroup <br /> ENGINEER'S REPORT,FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 <br />