Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE 20 <br /> be paid from non-assessment revenues. The City will also make a contribution of $9,703 <br /> from the General Fund for the cost of maintenance of the"general benefit"area along Arroyo, <br /> that was at one time included in this district. Similarly, City staff hours dedicated to the <br /> administration of the assessment is estimated to be at least$1,800 per year. However,since <br /> the budget only accounts for $600, the $1,200 difference is another monetary contribution <br /> from the City's General Fund. The total of these two amounts, $7,312, also helps offset any <br /> general benefit provided by the Improvements, in addition to the City non-monetary <br /> contributions described above. <br /> Source of Contributions from Other Funds to Satisfy 11.9% Requirement <br /> City non-monetary contributions: <br /> 10.0% (Curb and gutter) <br /> + 10.0% (Storm drainage system) <br /> + 10.0% (Public roads) <br /> + 20.0% (Amortized value of initial construction) <br /> = 50.0% (Total General Benefit paid from other funds) <br /> City monetary contributions: <br /> $6,112 General Fund payment for Prop 218 assessment increase review <br /> + $9,703 General Fund contribution for maintenance of area along Arroyo <br /> + $1,200 General Fund contribution for City staff assessment administration <br /> = $17,015 City of Pleasanton General Fund contribution <br /> ZONES OF BENEFIT <br /> The boundaries of the Assessment Area are carefully drawn to only include the properties <br /> that are proximate to the Improvements and that would materially benefit from the <br /> Improvements. <br /> In SVTA, the court noted that even a local agency-wide assessment district is appropriate <br /> under the right conditions: <br /> Cm Of PLEASANTON <br /> LIGHTING&LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1984-1,PONDEROSA SCIConsultingGroup <br /> ENGINEER'S REPORT,FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 <br />