My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
052119
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2019 5:22:45 PM
Creation date
5/15/2019 4:57:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
04 ATTACHMENT 2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
04 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
04 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
04 ATTACHMENT 6
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\052119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
district or to the public at large." General enhancement of property value does not <br /> constitute a "special benefit". To the extent an assessment provides both general <br /> benefits and special benefits, the City must separate the general benefits from the <br /> special benefits and the City is to pay for the general benefits out of another revenue <br /> source, typically the City's General Fund. Since the passage of Proposition 218, the City <br /> has evaluated this distinction between special and general benefits and determined that <br /> the landscaping and other improvements being maintained under each district is of <br /> special benefit to the property owners comprising each district. The City will evaluate <br /> these assessments based on the latest legal decisions regarding assessments for <br /> Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts as part of the analysis planned for this <br /> fiscal year. The Landscaping and Lighting assessment process, once assessments are <br /> updated to meet current maintenance requirements, will provide an efficient and <br /> effective means for maintenance to be assured. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The City currently has five Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts which are <br /> being assessed. <br /> When the properties within the districts are assessed, the net amount is included on the <br /> properties' county property tax bill. At that time, the County adds 1.7 percent to the base <br /> assessment as an administration fee. The assessments on the City-owned parcels <br /> located within Ponderosa-Del Prado, Bonde Ranch, Oak Tree Farm, and Moller Ranch <br /> Districts will not include the 1.7 percent county administration fee as the Finance <br /> Department will transfer the money from the General Fund into the specific district fund <br /> without involving the County. <br /> The Engineer's budget for each district should include a reserve fund to provide for the <br /> replacement of capital improvements such as planting, irrigation, decorative entry walls, <br /> signage, light fixtures, etc. Replacement costs should be calculated for the eventual <br /> replacement of the improvements of each district. Currently, the reserve funds are <br /> insufficient to cover these replacement costs due in part to the lack of adjustment of <br /> assessment amounts for over 20 years. This must be addressed and is further <br /> discussed later in this report. <br /> Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District 1984-1, Ponderosa-Del Prado <br /> The Ponderosa Homes subdivision (District 1984-1) has been in place for 35 years. <br /> Maintenance in this District includes the care of masonry walls, trees, shrubbery, <br /> groundcover and irrigation systems along Paseo Santa Cruz between Corte Santa <br /> Maria and Corte Pacifica. <br /> The overall assessments for the coming year for District 1984-1 (Ponderosa-Del Prado) <br /> will remain unchanged at $16.90 for each privately-owned parcel, and $16.62 for the <br /> one City-owned parcel. With a total of 344 units, including the City-owned parcel, this <br /> amounts to $5,813 in total assessments. This amount provides enough funding for the <br /> maintenance and plant replacement costs in all the special district areas along Paseo <br /> Santa Cruz, including water and electrical costs, county administration fees, and city <br /> administration fees. However, this amount does not provide adequate funding to cover <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.