Laserfiche WebLink
not reduced or waived parking requirements as part of this update. He added that under SB 50, <br /> the corresponding issue will be the BART Station. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. <br /> Howard Tsztoo referenced articles in the Pleasanton Weekly and results of a survey indicating <br /> 51% or more oppose residential in the downtown commercial area and over 90% do not want <br /> ground-level residential. He referenced the prohibition of three- or four-story structures behind <br /> shallow store front retail and referred to the recently build Spring Street structure that he <br /> concerned an eyesore. He felt mixed-use areas downtown should be amended and commented <br /> on the Barone property offering a great opportunity, but not for residential. <br /> Diane Envent referenced results of a survey relative to density; felt the real issue is how it feels <br /> and how it reflects the City's values and vision and noted people want the downtown core <br /> protected at two stories. She referenced challenges with the Starbucks building asserting it is <br /> shoved in like an ocean liner on a little street; referenced comments about tying in smaller streets <br /> to Main Street and reported people are struggling to keep Main Street vital. She discussed the <br /> importance of maintaining the small-town light and space that gives vibrancy, attractiveness, and <br /> invitation to mingle and economic vitality. <br /> Laura Olson, Executive Director of the Pleasanton Downtown Association and member of the <br /> Task Force, thanked everyone for their hard work on this process; discussed heights and FAR; <br /> noted the Task Force did not recommend changing anything in the commercial core and wanted <br /> clear and consistent zoning. She stated support to keep the 46-foot height and for the master <br /> design. <br /> Sandra Yamaoda reported participating and encouraging others to complete the survey and <br /> stated she does not support residential in the commercial core area of downtown or the height of <br /> 46 feet. She felt the Task Force veered away from the goal of increasing the vitality and <br /> maintaining the small-town feel in downtown. She opposed housing backing up to commercial <br /> buildings in the core area; noted parking and circulation are huge issues and asked Council <br /> instruct the Task Force and staff to consider the results of the survey and community emails and <br /> change the recommendations to reflect the desire and concerns of the community. <br /> Mike Carey commented on the work of volunteers, staff and the Task Force and asked Council to <br /> respect their time and commitment to the process and their recommendations as to what is best <br /> for Pleasanton. He reported no one supports ground-floor residential on Main Street and no one <br /> wants four stories. He provided examples of existing housing behind commercial uses; asked <br /> Council to preserve the existing zoning code to maintain the small-town character of downtown <br /> and the rights of seven years of the City's evolution. He noted if Council votes to change the <br /> allowed uses, what exists today could not be built and reported the PDA, the Chamber and the <br /> Downtown Owners Group all support no change. He urged Council to retain the current zoning <br /> and agreed with the idea of having 50 feet of commercial frontage. Mr. Carey discussed the City <br /> of Danville and reported their ordinance encourages residential in their downtown, as retail and <br /> residential compliment each other and addressed misinformation that has been circulated. <br /> Steve Van Dorn, President and CEO, Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, referenced his letter to <br /> the City; reported supporting the Task Force and staffs recommendations except for the active <br /> ground-floor overlay and a request for more parking. He hoped additional parking will be <br /> considered in this plan before it is finalized. He suggested a good location would be behind the <br /> Museum on Main Street, and commented on partnering with various groups on this issue and <br /> commented positively on the collaboration. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 14 of 20 April 16, 2019 <br />