My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN04162019
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
CCMIN04162019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2019 1:54:00 PM
Creation date
5/8/2019 1:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Brown's question regarding FAR, he added that different zoning codes in different <br /> cities define FAR differently and confirmed that the plan is amendable. <br /> Councilmember Narum referenced 370 units in the plan; reported receiving an email that the Task <br /> Force was contemplating 370 new residential units in the core of the historic downtown and asked <br /> for clarification. Director of Community Development Beaudin reported the 370 units will be <br /> spread across the entire plan area, including the Civic Center site where 124 of those units have <br /> been contemplated. The remaining 246 will be spread across the 300 acre plan area. In response <br /> to Councilmember Narum's question as to whether a four-story building could be built in the <br /> historic downtown area, Director of Community Development Beaudin reported there are policies <br /> addressing two- and three-story structures and a four-story building could be built but it would <br /> take a lot of public process and discussion and staff would probably recommend denial. <br /> Councilmember Brown noted staff is asking for four-stories on the existing Civic Center property <br /> and Director of Community Development Beaudin clarified it is 46 feet with 300% FAR, similar to <br /> Main Street and would create an envelope for development, but it does not mean the City would <br /> have to accept it. Design criteria would be considered with the broader development concept. <br /> Councilmember Narum referenced ground-floor residential on Main Street and asked whether <br /> residential could be built behind an existing building fronting Main Street that is 100% commercial. <br /> Director of Community Development Beaudin stated that is not the intent. He explained if <br /> someone comes in with a proposal to redevelopment a parcel, they would have to maintain the <br /> commercial space. In response to Councilmember Narum regarding policies to help protect Main <br /> Street, Director of Community Development Beaudin reported the City's legislative effort focuses <br /> on protecting downtown. Councilmember Narum referenced the EIR regarding significant impacts <br /> on traffic and reduced levels of service and asked how that is reconciled with the impacts of <br /> adding more housing. Director of Community Development Beaudin noted it is a policy decision to <br /> use that level of service and the idea of having to dramatically change the character of downtown <br /> to address it is not viable at this time. He reported vehicle miles traveled is a different approach to <br /> managing traffic and it is the direction in which cities are being required to move. Regarding the <br /> Shell and Barone properties Councilmember Narum asked if they would have to do CEQA work in <br /> consideration of doing an overlay, Director of Community Development Beaudin reported there <br /> will be additional analysis required. He confirmed that the height and FAR in the existing <br /> commercial district on Main Street is not proposed to be changed. <br /> In reply to Councilmember Testa, Director of Community Development Beaudin reported <br /> additional analysis would have to be done and explained staff contemplated using existing zoning <br /> and assumptions about the rate of change for downtown which seemed reasonable based on the <br /> rate of development and changes seen in the area. <br /> Director of Community Development Beaudin addressed areas zoned as commercial and <br /> reported the Task Force and staff considered mechanisms to help bring the Main Street <br /> experience on to side streets. <br /> Councilmember Testa asked about entertainment amenities and Director of Community <br /> Development Beaudin reported the zoning that is in place allows for all of those uses, currently, <br /> there are no existing buildings to accommodate those uses and the parceling does not lend itself <br /> to a large grocery store or theater, but when the market is ready the City will be happy to <br /> accommodate them. He confirmed the 50 feet referenced is meant to be the store depth or the <br /> linear interior store space. Councilmember Testa asked about the impacts to Downtown if SB 50 <br /> passes and asked if there are additional vulnerabilities to the State legislation. Director of <br /> Community Development Beaudin explained it may relieve a lot of the pressure downtown; staff <br /> continues to look at how legislation will impact the community and stated residential is allowed <br /> across downtown. He addressed parking and the State's intent on reducing costs and staff has <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 20 April 16, 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.