Laserfiche WebLink
(30-40)? Although traffic volumes may not be higher than commercial use, reducing <br /> vibrant retail space in core downtown seems contrary to DSP goals on increasing <br /> vibrancy. Adding two to three dozen homes could also likely create overflow parking <br /> issues on our city streets. <br /> The second part of her memo reflects that if those changes are implemented, which she <br /> believes are different assumptions, she would request the EIR include the following items be <br /> addressed for each of those areas to help the Commission understand the impact of the <br /> zoning changes: <br /> A. "Additional residential units (and number of bedrooms) versus today and versus <br /> draft EIR <br /> B. Additional buildable square footage versus today and versus draft EIR <br /> C. Additional traffic versus today and versus draft EIR with added incremental units <br /> D. Additional parking required versus today and versus draft EIR <br /> E. Any new potential environmental impacts that need to be studied (e.g., creek near <br /> Barone's) <br /> F. What is potential loss of existing retail square footage (to residential), excluding the <br /> town square? This is not an EIR issue but it is a business issue." <br /> She continued as follows: "On Item A, I would request we see the detail of the number of and <br /> what the driver of the incremental housing units will be at the unit level and bedroom level for <br /> our key strategy changes. This will help decision makers understand the impact of various <br /> choices. For example, how many units/bedrooms will come from: <br /> • New civic center <br /> • Map A rezones <br /> • Map B rezones <br /> • Allowing ground floor housing behind commercial where it was not previously <br /> allowed <br /> • Increasing FAR and building height beyond what is currently allowed." <br /> Chair Allen said that she recognized some of this might not be purely related to the EIR but <br /> this information is necessary for the Planning Commission, City Council and the community <br /> to understand to be able to come to a consensus. Her last comment was a question that was <br /> posed by a resident at the February 27 DSP meeting in regard to a concern that the DSP <br /> Task Force has a low turnout of residents in attendance at the meetings. She said there was <br /> one resident this evening and possibly two or three residents at the end of the EIR, which <br /> might be a result of some recommendations that were made which were somewhat <br /> inconsistent with the early feedback received from surveys completed by residents and the <br /> limited attendance from previous meetings. She expressed concern that residents will be <br /> caught off-guard by the end of the process. She posed a question to staff as to whether a <br /> workshop could be held for residents living in the downtown area, so they can be informed on <br /> some of the major changes being proposed and their implications. <br /> Commissioner Brown commented that since Chair Allen's comments are now included as <br /> public record, he requested a copy of the letter she referenced. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 18 March 13, 2019 <br />nits/bedrooms than in the base plan <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 18 March 13, 2019 <br />uidance in terms of street parking <br /> on a public street and set within the conditions is a requirement to utilize the garage. He said <br /> he likes the suggestion of establishing guidelines when on-boarding new parents around the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 18 March 13, 2019 <br />as a nine-year-old child in the program and Ms. Arango helped him <br /> speak English. She has learned it is very important for kids to become bilingual and spoke <br /> highly of the daycare and of Ms. Arango and asked for the Commission's approval. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 18 March 13, 2019 <br />mmunity. She follows all rules and instructs the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 18 March 13, 2019 <br />