Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2019-06 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> A. Spacing. No large family day care home shall be approved if the site of the <br /> proposed use is located within 300 feet of the exterior boundary of another <br /> large family day care home or nursery school, unless the zoning administrator <br /> makes the specific finding that the concentration of such uses will not <br /> adversely affect the neighborhood in which it is located due to the cumulative <br /> increase in noise, traffic and/or parking requirements. <br /> Staff has verified that the proposed use is not within 300 feet of another large family <br /> day care home or a nursery school. Thus, staff does not believe spacing or <br /> concentration are an issue. <br /> B. Traffic Control. Large family day care homes shall not create any traffic <br /> hazard. The zoning administrator may prescribe such conditions as may be <br /> reasonably required to ensure the safety of all affected by the proposed use, <br /> including requiring traffic-control measures reasonably required to avoid any <br /> identified adverse effect. <br /> The subject site is located in a residential neighborhood with single-family detached <br /> homes. The expansion of the current small family day care home to a large family <br /> day care home will bring additional vehicles to the neighborhood during drop-off and <br /> pickup times. However, the additional traffic will not create any traffic hazard. <br /> Several neighbors indicated that the traffic tends to be fast-moving and substantial <br /> on Chardonnay Drive and that the proposal would contribute to the existing traffic <br /> and would affect existing traffic-safety issues. In consideration of these concerns, <br /> the Zoning Administrator included conditions of approval to do the following: <br /> (1) require the driveway be made available for parents during drop-off/pickup times; <br /> (2) prohibit double-parking in the street or temporarily block traffic or block <br /> neighbors' driveways; and (3) prohibit parking or making U-turns in neighboring <br /> residents' driveways. Staff believes that, with the imposed conditions, the operation <br /> of the proposed large family day care home will not create any traffic hazard to the <br /> immediate neighborhood. <br /> The appeal from Joshua Brysk cited specific concerns with respect to general and <br /> emergency vehicle access, given that Sauterne Way is restricted to one-way traffic <br /> (southbound only) from Vineyard Avenue to Chardonnay Way. The study completed <br /> by the City in 1998-1999 determined that this restriction would not cause any traffic <br /> safety issues at the time; the Traffic Engineering Division has further determined that <br /> traffic volumes have not substantially changed such that addition of new trips <br /> associated with the project would exceed the capacity of the street or cause traffic <br /> hazards. Further, since the one-way restriction on Sauterne Way is through striping <br /> only, and there is no traffic barrier, traffic could exit the neighborhood in the event of <br /> the need to evacuate the neighborhood in the event of an emergency. <br /> Based on the above, the project will not cause any traffic hazards. <br /> of the dripline of the existing trees. <br /> g. No equipment or temporary structures shall be placed within or beneath the dripline of <br /> the existing trees. <br /> Failure to comply with these requirements may result in a "stop work order." <br /> 70. SITE LIGHTING: All site lighting shall be Dark Sky Compliant and shall be subject to review and <br /> approval by the City Landscape Architect prior to building permit issuance. <br /> P18-0269 Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 of 10 <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br />ake place underneath <br /> or within 5-feet of the dripline of the existing trees. <br /> PUD-131 Planning Commission <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br /> of a demolition permit, or the first building permit, whichever <br /> PUD-131 Planning Commission <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />