My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2019-02
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC-2019-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2019 10:09:32 AM
Creation date
4/11/2019 10:07:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/20/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2019-02
NOTES
P19-0027, SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES ORDINANCE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. <br /> AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> AMENDING CHAPTER 18.110 OF THE PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES PURSUANT <br /> TO APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution and sections <br /> 36931 et seq. of the California Government Code, the City Council may make and enforce within <br /> its limits all local, police, sanitary and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general <br /> laws; and <br /> WHEREAS, significant changes in federal and State law that affect local authority over <br /> wireless communications facilities ("WCFs") have occurred, including but not limited to the <br /> following: <br /> 1) On November 18, 2009, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") adopted a <br /> declaratory ruling (the "2009 Shot Clock"), which established presumptively reasonable <br /> timeframes for State and local governments to act on applications for WCFs; and <br /> 2) On February 22, 2012, Congress adopted Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax <br /> Relief and Job Creation Act ("Section 6409(a)"), which mandated that State and local <br /> governments approve certain modifications and collocations to existing WCFs; and <br /> 3) On October 17, 2014, the FCC adopted a report and order that, among other things, <br /> implemented new limitations on how State and local governments review applications covered by <br /> Section 6409(a), established an automatic approval for such applications when the local reviewing <br /> authority fails to act within 60 days, and also further restricted generally applicable procedural <br /> rules under the 2009 Shot Clock. This report and order effectively preempted local moratoria on <br /> WCFs by finding that the 2009 Shot Clock continues to run even when a valid moratorium is <br /> adopted; and <br /> 4) On October 9, 2015, California adopted Assembly Bill No. 57 (Quirk), which deemed <br /> approved any WCF applications when the local reviewing authority fails to act within the 2009 <br /> Shot Clock timeframes; and <br /> 5) On August 2, 2018, the FCC adopted a declaratory ruling that formally prohibited <br /> express and de facto moratoria for all telecommunications services and facilities under 47 U.S.C. <br /> § 253(a) and directed the Wireline Competition Bureau and the Wireless Telecommunications <br /> Bureau to hear and resolve all complaints on an expedited basis; and <br /> 6) On September 26, 2018, the FCC adopted a declaratory ruling and report and order <br /> that, among other things, creates a new regulatory classification for small wireless facilities, <br /> requires State and local governments to process applications for small wireless facilities within 60 <br /> days or 90 days, establishes a national standard for an effective prohibition and provides that a <br /> failure to act within the applicable timeframe presumptively constitutes an effective prohibition. <br /> WHEREAS, given the rapid and significant changes in federal and State law, the actual <br /> and effective prohibition on moratoria to amend local policies in response to such changes and <br /> the significant adverse consequences for noncompliance with federal and State law, the City <br /> Council desires to amend Pleasanton Municipal Code Chapter 18.110, to allow greater flexibility <br />ible by the <br /> Director of Engineering/City Engineer. <br /> Fees and Bonds <br /> 30. ACTING CITY SURVEYOR MAP REVIEW: The applicant shall submit a preliminary copy of the <br /> final map, approved tentative map, preliminary title report(s), adjoining deeds, and underlying <br /> recorded maps to the Director of Engineering/City Engineer, prior to submittal of the first plan <br /> Vesting Tentative Map 8483 Planning Commission <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />