Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2019-02 <br /> Page Two <br /> change in the environment. If the proposed code amendment did qualify as a "project" <br /> subject to CEQA, the project would exempt from further environmental review in <br /> accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because the project involves the <br /> adoption of regulations for small wireless facilities and does not directly or indirectly <br /> authorize or approve any actual physical change in the environment. <br /> PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of <br /> Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on February 20, 2019, by the following vote: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Brown, Ritter <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> RECUSED: None <br /> ABSENT: Commissioner O'Connor <br /> 0/d-- <br /> Ellen Clark Nancy Al r / <br /> Secretary, Planning Commission Chair v <br /> APPROVED AS TO FORM: <br /> gull Harryman <br /> assistant City Attorney <br /> Exhibits: <br /> A. Draft Ordinance amending Chapter 18.110 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code <br /> B. Draft City Council Policy, Small Wireless Facilities <br />d the staff report, other written reports, public testimony and other <br /> information contained in the record; <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of <br /> Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written staff <br /> reports and all public comment and testimony, that: <br /> A. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council amend Chapter <br /> 18.110 of the Municipal Code and adopt a new policy regulating small wireless facilities <br /> based on the following: <br /> 1 . Recent changes in federal law limit local governments from exercising full zoning <br /> controls over small wireless facilities. Although these new regulations are subject <br /> to a pending legal challenge, the regulations are currently in partial effect and <br /> failure to comply at this time may result in an even more significant loss of local <br /> control. The proposed code amendment would comply with the recent changes in <br /> federal law by providing reasonable aesthetic regulations and a review and <br /> approval process for such facilities within the City of Pleasanton that is consistent <br /> with the new, shorter timeframes to act on a permit application. (The <br /> recommended amendment to Chapter 18.110 of the Municipal Code is included <br /> as Exhibit A, attached hereto.) <br /> 2. The proposal to the City Council includes the adoption of a new City Council <br /> policy that would include design and operational standards for small wireless <br /> facilities that would provide the maximum amount of local control legally <br /> established for the regulation of small wireless facilities. (The recommended <br /> Policy on Small Wireless Facilities is included as Exhibit B, attached.) <br /> B. The proposed code amendment is not considered a "project" under the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the proposal is not an activity that has the <br /> potential for a direct physical change or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical <br />[end] <br /> Vesting Tentative Map 8483 Planning Commission <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br />rk-Recorder's Office. Within a <br /> reasonable amount of time following recordation, the applicant's title company shall provide a <br /> copy of each recorded document to the Engineering Department determined to be legible by the <br /> Director of Engineering/City Engineer. <br /> Fees and Bonds <br /> 30. ACTING CITY SURVEYOR MAP REVIEW: The applicant shall submit a preliminary copy of the <br /> final map, approved tentative map, preliminary title report(s), adjoining deeds, and underlying <br /> recorded maps to the Director of Engineering/City Engineer, prior to submittal of the first plan <br /> Vesting Tentative Map 8483 Planning Commission <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />