My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
041619
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2019 2:11:20 PM
Creation date
4/10/2019 12:21:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
03 ATTACHMENT 2a
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\041619
03 ATTACHMENT 2a1
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\041619
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
new fencing, and new accessory structures. The Landscape Plans can be further <br /> reviewed in the attached plans, Exhibit B. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Consistency with Zoning District Regulations: <br /> The NSSP indicates the PUD-A zoning district is intended to correspond "generally" to <br /> the Agricultural (A) District of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) as modified in the <br /> NSSP. As such, staff has analyzed the proposal in relation to the Agricultural district in <br /> the PMC. However, it should be noted that the PUD district allows flexibility in creating <br /> development standards and there may be deviation from the A-district standards, subject <br /> to Commission and Council approval. <br /> Table 1, below, is a comparison of the development standards in the A-district, proposed <br /> development standards, and the proposed project. The proposed development <br /> standards for the main residence meet the A-district standards in all respects aside from <br /> height and floor area maximum (as detailed further in the Building Design section of this <br /> report). <br /> Table 1: Site Development Conformance Table <br /> Site Development Standards <br /> A-District Proposed Standards Proposed Residence <br /> Front Yard Setback 30' 30' 1 ll -174' <br /> Side Yard Setbacks One side 30' One side 30' El -56' and -57' <br /> Combined 100' Combined 100' El -113' <br /> Rear Yard Setback 50' 50' El -53' <br /> Floor Area Maximum N/A 8,500 sq. ft.2 El 7,115 sq. ft. 3 <br /> Height Maximum 30' 31'-3" El 31'-3" <br /> Parking Minimum Two Spaces Two Spaces El Three spaces <br /> Table 2, below, is a comparison of the Class I accessory structure standards in two <br /> different PMC zoning districts (i.e., A-district and R-1-40,000) and the proposed <br /> standards for the subject lot. The proposed standards follow that of the R-1-40,000 <br /> zoning district rather than the A-district. The subject -1.33-acre (57,738-square-foot) lot <br /> is substantially smaller than the lot minimum required in the PMC A-district (i.e., 5-acres) <br /> and is much closer to the minimum required in the PMC R-1-40,000-district <br /> (i.e., 40,000-square-feet). As such, requiring accessory structures to meet the A-district <br /> standards may be overly restrictive for the subject lot and staff recommends following <br /> the R-1-40,000 standards. The existing and proposed accessory structures on-site all <br /> meet the R-1-40,000 Class I accessory structure standards. <br /> The applicant will dedicate 20' of right-of-way in the front of the property as part of this project. The front yard <br /> setback is being measured from the new property line/edge of the right-of-way. <br /> 2 Combined garage area on the lot exceeding 600 sq. ft. and all other enclosed accessory structures are included in the <br /> calculation. <br /> This includes existing structures on the site(less 600 sq.ft. of garage). The proposed residence is 5,059 sq. ft. and <br /> the proposed garage is 939 sq.ft.. <br /> a Measured from the average elevation of the natural grade of the ground covered by the structure to the mean height <br /> between the eaves and ridges, as defined by the PMC. <br /> PUD-131, 481 Sycamore Rd. Planning Commission <br /> 4 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.