My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PARKS AND RECREATION
>
2019
>
041119
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 12:52:08 PM
Creation date
4/5/2019 1:01:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/10/2019
Document Relationships
04 ATTACHMENT 1
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PARKS AND RECREATION\2019\041119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. Correct identified issues on both. the -first and second floors, while at the same <br />time relocating walls, stairs, ,etc. within the existing building to increase <br />programming opportunities and to allow a wider range of activities. In this <br />scenario the stairs would be relocated and an elevator installed within the <br />existing building. ($3.5 million) <br />It should be noted that the Century House Assessment Report focuses solely on the <br />building itself and not the Bicentennial Park grounds on which the house stands, or the <br />separate park area behind the building. Renovation of the house to allow or increase <br />use will likely require a review of parking options for the facility. The choices for <br />additional parking could include construction of a parking lot on the front lawn area or <br />the park area behind the building. The review of parking options will be dependent on <br />the preferred building renovation strategy and is therefore outside the scope of JKA's <br />Pleasanton Century House Assessment Report. <br />Also, while the assessment report focuses on the existing conditions of the Century <br />House and recommendations for renovations, another alternative could be demolition of <br />the existing building. The area currently used by the building could be incorporated into <br />the park, or another building could be designed and constructed for specific <br />programmed uses or activities on the current site, or elsewhere within the park. The <br />new building could be designed with a fagade to emulate the existing building. Again, <br />this is outside the scope of JKA's report, but it is another option the Commission may <br />wish to consider. Demolishing the existing building and constructing a new building <br />would require additional study to determine how the new building would programmed <br />and utilized, as well as- reviewing parking needs, before a reliable cost estimate can be <br />prepared. <br />ALTERNATIVE ACTION <br />Any other action as determined by the Parks and Recreation Commission. <br />Submitted by: <br />Steve Kirk atrick <br />Director of Engineering <br />Attachments: <br />1. March 30, 2019 Pleasanton Century House Assessment Report <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.