Laserfiche WebLink
Heidi Murphy <br />Final Report to City of Pleasanton Library and Recreation Department <br />February 26, 2019 page 6 <br />This is a smart practice for the implementation of title ll. <br />16. Establish ongoing training for Department staffs regarding disability <br />awareness, inclusion concepts, inclusion techniques, and current court and <br />administrative decisions. This is a smart practice for the implementation <br />of title 1135.150. <br />17. Inclusion also means existing City sites have been evaluated for compliance <br />with California Title 24 and ADA 2010 Standards for Accessible Design <br />requirements, and that a phased retrofit plan (known as a transition plan) has <br />been prepared. The City did prepare a transition plan in 2004, and it was <br />updated in 2008. Retrofits listed in the transition plan have been included in <br />the biennial Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The US Department of Justice <br />adopted standards for park assets such as playgrounds, sports fields and <br />courts, and pools, in 2010, and these became effective in 2012. As the <br />earlier City transition. plan was completed before the new Standards became <br />effective, we recommend: <br />A. That the City retain an expert familiar with Title 24 and ADA requirements <br />and update the existing transition plan, which should include a <br />current access audit of all existing City facilities as required by title 11 <br />35.105. <br />B. That the City require the expert to, after the access audits, develop a <br />phased retrofit plan that meets or exceeds the title 11 requirements <br />found at 35.150(d). <br />C. That the City continue to include updated transition plan access retrofit <br />work in the biennial CIP. <br />SECTION 2: Recommendations for Specific Pleasanton Programs . <br />The systemic recommendations above establish a framework for City departments <br />-or activities. We did have the opportunity to review some specific processes and <br />materials and our remarks in that regard are below. <br />Our review process included a look at documents we received from the Department. <br />We marked up those documents with recommended changes, and we provided <br />those to Department staffs earlier. <br />We do note that our interviews and.the review of Department processes and <br />publications occurred almost three years. ago. Our remarks below are based on. <br />those documents, and not any documents that are more current than 2016. We <br />recommend the changes described below: <br />2016/2017 Season Firehouse Arts Center <br />a. The material lacks information about what to do if guest needs <br />modifications for a program. This can be provided for online purchases by <br />