Laserfiche WebLink
Mr.Nelson Fialho/Dr.David Haglund Page 6 <br /> Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities <br /> With functions that involve the public coming to the site, the City would need to be <br /> concerned with issues of parking, liability and potentially neighborhood traffic, depending <br /> on the volume.Data was not specifically sought regarding the number of cars in and out of <br /> the area with non-maintenance functions, and that would need to be provided during the <br /> next phase of study. <br /> 2. Can current buildings or outside spaces be reconfigured to accommodate District uses? <br /> Once a determination is made about which functions would be appropriate for co-location <br /> at the Operations Services Center, an assessment of the site will be needed. It should include <br /> both the current uses and needs, and any future space requirements that have been <br /> identified (or will be through a more thorough examination,considering future population <br /> growth and other needs).Some areas may have excess space and can be reduced in size, <br /> while others may require additional space than presently available.The assessment should <br /> include, at the minimum: <br /> • Square feet required for each operation to be located at the site; <br /> • Possible consolidation of current city storage areas(e.g., the boneyard,storage and bin <br /> storage areas); <br /> • Lunch room,restrooms,storage and conference rooms. <br /> • Possible reconfiguration of the boneyard and the Fire District training area(not <br /> including the tower) <br /> • Consideration of the sewer building as an opportunity site, if storage needs can be <br /> addressed <br /> 3. Could some functions be coordinated or could some spaces be shared by both entities? <br /> The economies of scale that can be achieved through the coordination of functions and <br /> shared use of space, along with the estimated cost savings and benefits to the parties should <br /> be evaluated.The City and District noted during the April meeting that they currently <br /> collaborate on the fueling of vehicles(with the District's use of the City's fueling facilities). <br /> Co-locating operations may present further opportunities for coordinating services. <br /> Examples of potential opportunities that could be studied are listed below. <br /> 1. Vehicle maintenance and repair operations <br /> 2. Grounds keeping <br /> 3. Emergency Operations Center(EOC) <br /> 4. Other uses,such as offices, conference rooms, locker rooms and outdoor spaces <br /> For any of these,there will be a host of issues to consider, including costs, administrative <br /> issues, logistics,employee relations and others. <br /> 4. Are there alternatives available other than the Operations Services Center site? <br /> In conducting a full feasibility study, Management Partners recommends that alternatives <br /> be examined, such as the following: <br /> • Potential to locate PUSD maintenance facility in close proximity to the OSC, providing <br /> some of the benefits without the impact on existing City operations. Properties directly <br /> across the street from OSC and adjacent to OSC could both be analyzed. <br />