My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
040819
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2019 5:13:29 PM
Creation date
3/28/2019 5:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/8/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr.Nelson Fialho/Dr.David Haglund Page 6 <br /> Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities <br /> With functions that involve the public coming to the site, the City would need to be <br /> concerned with issues of parking, liability and potentially neighborhood traffic, depending <br /> on the volume.Data was not specifically sought regarding the number of cars in and out of <br /> the area with non-maintenance functions, and that would need to be provided during the <br /> next phase of study. <br /> 2. Can current buildings or outside spaces be reconfigured to accommodate District uses? <br /> Once a determination is made about which functions would be appropriate for co-location <br /> at the Operations Services Center, an assessment of the site will be needed. It should include <br /> both the current uses and needs, and any future space requirements that have been <br /> identified (or will be through a more thorough examination,considering future population <br /> growth and other needs).Some areas may have excess space and can be reduced in size, <br /> while others may require additional space than presently available.The assessment should <br /> include, at the minimum: <br /> • Square feet required for each operation to be located at the site; <br /> • Possible consolidation of current city storage areas(e.g., the boneyard,storage and bin <br /> storage areas); <br /> • Lunch room,restrooms,storage and conference rooms. <br /> • Possible reconfiguration of the boneyard and the Fire District training area(not <br /> including the tower) <br /> • Consideration of the sewer building as an opportunity site, if storage needs can be <br /> addressed <br /> 3. Could some functions be coordinated or could some spaces be shared by both entities? <br /> The economies of scale that can be achieved through the coordination of functions and <br /> shared use of space, along with the estimated cost savings and benefits to the parties should <br /> be evaluated.The City and District noted during the April meeting that they currently <br /> collaborate on the fueling of vehicles(with the District's use of the City's fueling facilities). <br /> Co-locating operations may present further opportunities for coordinating services. <br /> Examples of potential opportunities that could be studied are listed below. <br /> 1. Vehicle maintenance and repair operations <br /> 2. Grounds keeping <br /> 3. Emergency Operations Center(EOC) <br /> 4. Other uses,such as offices, conference rooms, locker rooms and outdoor spaces <br /> For any of these,there will be a host of issues to consider, including costs, administrative <br /> issues, logistics,employee relations and others. <br /> 4. Are there alternatives available other than the Operations Services Center site? <br /> In conducting a full feasibility study, Management Partners recommends that alternatives <br /> be examined, such as the following: <br /> • Potential to locate PUSD maintenance facility in close proximity to the OSC, providing <br /> some of the benefits without the impact on existing City operations. Properties directly <br /> across the street from OSC and adjacent to OSC could both be analyzed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.