My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
040819
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2019 5:13:29 PM
Creation date
3/28/2019 5:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/8/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> As the Pleasanton Unified School District begins to explore its facility needs in regards to the location <br /> of its District offices on First Street, and while the City of Pleasanton evaluates the efficacy and <br /> efficiency of the Operations Service Center at 3333 Busch Road, the opportunity arose for a joint <br /> exercise to research and discuss the viability of a shared maintenance facility that would occupy <br /> underutilized space at the Operations Service Center. <br /> To guide the process, the consulting firm Management Partners was contracted to facilitate <br /> discussion between the two agencies, collect and analyze data, and provide the City and School <br /> District with a preliminary assessment for the feasibility of co-location. Over the course of several <br /> months, two meetings were held between the two organizations to discuss potential benefits and <br /> challenges to implementing a co-located space, and to better understand the facility needs of each <br /> organization in order to highlight any potential efficiencies that could be rendered from such an <br /> arrangement. <br /> A survey of both locations was completed, including an inventory of staff space and its usage, facility <br /> space and its programming, and an overview of the vehicle fleet of each organization (and <br /> subsequent parking/storage requirements). The totality of this information was collected and reviewed <br /> by Management Partners, which then prepared a summary report (Attachment 1) outlining the <br /> findings and possible next steps. The report summarizes the key policy issues, identifies 16 key <br /> questions for the parties to consider, presents four case studies of similar partnerships between <br /> public agencies, outlines an approach for a potential area master plan (should one be created), and <br /> recommends next steps. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The findings of the preliminary feasibility study demonstrated that, although the co-location of the <br /> facilities was feasible, it would not be the most efficient arrangement for either agency. As both the <br /> City and the District continue to expand their operations due to growth, and service demands, a co- <br /> location arrangement may inhibit the ability of either agency to expand their maintenance facility <br /> footprint to accommodate for future needs. Instead, the report finds that having the maintenance <br /> facilities located in proximity to one another would yield the same efficiency benefits while not <br /> inhibiting either agency to expand operations as future needs arise. Through the negotiations with <br /> developers on the East Side Specific Plan process, property could be acquired either to the west <br /> (Lionstone Group Property) or to the south (Kiewit Property) that would allow for proximity to the <br /> City's Operations Service Center on Busch Road. <br /> Following two presentations to the City of Pleasanton / PUSD Board of Trustees Liaison committee, <br /> City staff from both agencies met to discuss the future scope of work and timeline for the project. Both <br /> the City Manager and Superintendent concluded that developing a master plan for the area would be <br /> the optimal course of action to take to pursue a long-term strategy as it relates to City and District's <br /> maintenance facilities and functions. Based on the work completed to date and feedback from the <br /> City and the District in the scoping session, the following parameters have been tentatively agreed to <br /> by both agencies for the scope of a potential master plan: <br /> • Location options <br /> • Operational requirements <br /> • Reconfiguration options to maximize use and operations of existing OSC <br /> • Opportunities to reduce space needs through shared services <br /> • Parking and circulation requirements <br /> • Parking impacts <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.