Laserfiche WebLink
options. Staff will recommend an urgency ordinance to go into effect immediately which <br />requires a 4/5 vote. If there is not a 4/5 vote, they will propose a regular ordinance which takes <br />a second reading and would go to the Council with noticing for March 19 and would be <br />effective 30 days thereafter; however, this brings them to April 19 which just misses the <br />deadlines for having aesthetic regulations in place. <br />Commissioner Balch said he has noticed there are many AT&T and Verizon sites that have <br />been agendized for staff level approval and he asked if those were small cell facilities. <br />Mr. Beaudin confirmed they were not technically small cell as being discussed today, but some <br />are considered micro -cell. These are seen on Zoning Administrator Action Reports for design <br />review applications. Some of them end up going through the building permit process, some get <br />built, some do not and many are modifications to existing cell sites. <br />Commissioner Ritter asked if the updated ordinance will make the process more streamlined <br />and less subjective. <br />Mr. Beaudin confirmed the policy is to create objective standards which will then allow staff to <br />process within the shot clock time allowed for the small cell sites. <br />Commissioner Ritter asked if staff wished to modify any of the recommendations, given the <br />presentation, questions and comments prior to the Commission's recommendation to the City <br />Council. <br />Mr. Beaudin said Mr. May raised the concern around bonding and he also thought there was <br />some question around the 750 feet which Commissioner Brown raised. <br />Commissioner Brown said he also thinks the Commission should consider the consumer <br />aspect because it sounds as if there is a legitimate technical concern. <br />Mr. May referred to concealment and the situation where the applicant might come in with a <br />5G antenna that could not be shrouded but were able to put some shrouding around the <br />non -antenna parts of it and cover it with film. This is what has been seen and considered as <br />concealment and they seek to have the design of it blend in better with the background. <br />Commissioner Brown said he understands the design intent to disguise them as much as <br />possible, but he thinks within the policy should have greater degrees of freedom to do that. <br />Commissioner Balch asked and confirmed that staff was seeking adoption of the policy and <br />ordinance as drafted and thinks the bonding element was essential as well as the 750 feet of <br />distance. Mr. Beaudin agreed, and reaffirmed the Commission was also being asked to include <br />the modifications contained in the memo on the dais. <br />Commissioner Brown said what concerns him with the 750 feet is that the whole point of 5G is <br />high speed low to the ground, close to the user of the wireless end point, and he questioned <br />how this would be accomplished at 750 feet. It is more about data propagation and the ability <br />to deliver a quality of service that meets the standard. Therefore, he supports the policy but <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 12 February 20, 2019 <br />