Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF Planning Commission <br /> e °�6� Agenda Report <br /> 6781e:79999 <br /> Ilii0V1141141111111r41 <br /> lsxUrl) <br /> pLEASANTON© March 13219Item 5.1D. <br /> SUBJECT: PUD-131 <br /> APPLICANT: Henry Batteate, Ridgecrest Designs <br /> PROPERTY OWNER: Erin & Chase Sorge! <br /> PURPOSE: Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br /> development plan approval to construct an approximately <br /> 5,059-square-foot single-family residence with an <br /> approximately 939-square-foot attached garage and to <br /> convert the existing 1,016-square-foot residence to an <br /> Accessory Dwelling Unit. <br /> LOCATION: 481 Sycamore Road <br /> GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential <br /> SPECIFIC PLAN: North Sycamore Specific Plan — PUD-Agricultural <br /> ZONING: Planned Unit Development- Agricultural (PUD-A) District <br /> EXHIBITS: A. Draft Resolution and Conditions of Approval <br /> B. Project plans dated "Received January 18, 2019" <br /> C. Geotechnical Report dated "Received August 2, 2018" <br /> D. Arborist Report dated "January 18, 2019" <br /> E. Location and Notification Map <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution <br /> recommending approval of PUD-131 to the City Council, based on the required findings <br /> and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A. <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> The proposed project is to construct an approximately 5,059-square-foot, two-story <br /> single-family residence with an attached approximately 939-square-foot garage and <br /> convert an existing 1,016-square-foot, one-story residence into an Accessory Dwelling <br /> Unit. The subject lot is part of the North Sycamore Specific Plan, however, it has never <br /> had a PUD development plan approved. As such, the project requires PUD development <br /> plan approval. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with <br /> conditions, or denial of the application to the City Council. <br />1 Sleepy Head Lane Planning Commission <br /> Page 8 of 8 <br />nia's Green Building Standards Code, "CALGreen." <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> As outlined in the above analysis staff believes the design of the home, as proposed and <br /> conditioned, would be compatible with the other homes in the vicinity and not create adverse <br /> impacts, and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project as proposed and <br /> conditioned. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning <br /> Commission include: <br /> 1. Denial of all or part of the application. The Commission may deny the entire project; <br /> 2. Approval of the Design Review with modifications. The Planning Commission could <br /> approve the Design Review of the home with modifications to the architecture, <br /> landscaping, or other site improvement changes. <br /> Since staff believes the project will not adversely impact any properties or the surrounding <br /> area, that the project has been designed to be compatible with the existing homes in the area <br /> and conforms to the PUD-31 site development standards and design guidelines, staff <br /> recommends that neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued. <br /> P18-0269, 1131 Sleepy Head Lane Planning Commission <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />