Laserfiche WebLink
Tree Removal and Landscape Design <br /> The site currently maintains 10 trees that were newly planted with the construction of the road <br /> and 15 trees that were originally part of the property. Of the 15 original trees, eight are <br /> classified as heritage trees by the Pleasanton Municipal Code. As part of the proposal, the <br /> applicant is proposing to remove six of the original trees, two of which are heritage trees. The <br /> size, species, and health of all trees on-site are included in the arborist report included in <br /> Exhibit B. The PUD-31 design guidelines include a target of one tree to be planted for every <br /> 1 ,000 sq. ft. of lot size, with 30 percent of those trees to be 24-inch box in size or larger. Per <br /> this target, there should be approximately 87 new trees planted on site. There are currently 10 <br /> trees already planted on-site and an additional 97 are proposed on-site (30 of these trees <br /> (30.9%) are 24-inch box size), for a total of 107 trees. Staff has reviewed the proposed <br /> landscape plans and believes that adequate planting has been provided to mitigate the <br /> removal of the six existing trees and that the site has been designed in accordance with the <br /> PUD design guidelines. <br /> Driveway <br /> The Happy Valley Specific Plan and PUD Design Guidelines encourage the use of gravel or <br /> shale for driveways leading to individual homes, rather than concrete or blacktop. The <br /> applicant is proposing to use individual concrete pavers leading from Sleepy Head Lane to the <br /> home. Staff believes that the proposed driveway material is consistent with the intent of the <br /> Happy Valley Specific Plan and PUD design guidelines as the pavers would help to break up <br /> the long driveway and add an attractive design element in the front of the property. <br /> Green Building Measures <br /> The proposed home is more than 2,000-square-feet in size and therefore is required to comply <br /> with the City's Green Building Ordinance and show that the proposed project would achieve 50 <br /> points, consistent with the City's ordinance. As proposed, the applicant has indicated that they <br /> can achieve 63 points. As conditioned, the final Green Building measures and score will be <br /> determined with the review of the building permit application. The project will also need to <br /> conform to the State of California's Green Building Standards Code, "CALGreen." <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> As outlined in the above analysis staff believes the design of the home, as proposed and <br /> conditioned, would be compatible with the other homes in the vicinity and not create adverse <br /> impacts, and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project as proposed and <br /> conditioned. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning <br /> Commission include: <br /> 1. Denial of all or part of the application. The Commission may deny the entire project; <br /> 2. Approval of the Design Review with modifications. The Planning Commission could <br /> approve the Design Review of the home with modifications to the architecture, <br /> landscaping, or other site improvement changes. <br /> Since staff believes the project will not adversely impact any properties or the surrounding <br /> area, that the project has been designed to be compatible with the existing homes in the area <br /> and conforms to the PUD-31 site development standards and design guidelines, staff <br /> recommends that neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued. <br /> P18-0269, 1131 Sleepy Head Lane Planning Commission <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />