Laserfiche WebLink
Noes: Councilmember Brown <br /> Absent: None <br /> 16. Adopt the Foothill Road Bicycle Corridor Plan <br /> The agenda report and a PowerPoint were resented by City Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano and <br /> Associate Traffic Engineer Matt Nelson, which included: Foothill BCP — Overview, Character <br /> Area 1: Employment and Retail, Character Areas 1 & 2, Character Area 2 — Neighborhood <br /> Residential Focus Area, Character Areas 2 & 3, Character Area 3: Low Density Residential and <br /> Recreational, and Foothill Road Sidewalk Improvement. <br /> Mr. Nelson provided a background of the project which included consultation of the Bicycle <br /> Pedestrian Master Plan and feedback from bicyclists, including gap closures and continuous <br /> lanes. The goal was to create a complete document illustrating the corridor-wide improvements. <br /> Staff contracted with with Fehr & Peers to create the plan and the primary focus was bicycles. The <br /> Bicycle, Pedestrian and Trails Committee (BPTC) served as the steering committee. <br /> Mr. Nelson described the corridor project area as five miles long and included three character <br /> areas: Character Area 1 — Employment and Retail Focus Area, Character Area 2 — Neighborhood <br /> Residential Focus Area, and Character Area 3 — Low Density Residential and Recreational Focus <br /> Area. The Foothill Bicycle Corridor Plan (BCP) includes short and long term improvements <br /> including striping and minor concrete/asphalt work, acquisition of right-of-way and other higher <br /> cost projects. The goals of the Foothill BCP are to create an all ages and abilities corridor, provide <br /> street facilities for avid cyclists, and develop a document for future development and funding. <br /> Mr. Nelson presented and described Character Area 1: Employment and Retail. The area was <br /> improved with existing street project funds including signing, striping, and concrete work. He <br /> continued by describing Character Area 2 — Neighborhood Residential Focus Area and described <br /> various improvements including slurry seal and striping, six foot buffers, enhanced crosswalks, <br /> green paint and hybrid beacons. <br /> Councilmember Brown inquired as to whether the City could claim land on the other side of the <br /> road, related to parking lot circulation and the pick-up queue at the school. Mr. Tassano noted <br /> there is an opportunity for improvements and some are included in the current circulation element. <br /> The future plan is to design a second left turn lane to maintain the level of service. <br /> Councilmember Pentin inquired whether there will be detection devices, such as at the Bernal <br /> location. Staff mentioned the devices are in place and are included in the proposed <br /> enhancements. <br /> Mr. Nelson then presented and described Character Area 3 - Low Density Residential and <br /> Recreational Focus Area. This area presents the most constrained area for proposing <br /> enhancements. The area includes two foot buffers with limited ability to conduct improvements. <br /> There is potential for small width improvements or enhancements. <br /> Mr. Nelson described the Foothill Road Sidewalk Improvement plan. The short term plan will <br /> include replacement of existing deteriorating asphalt and installation of a fence similar to what <br /> exists on Bernal Avenue. The work will commence during the Pleasanton Unified School District <br /> school breaks. Further analysis will be required to determine whether the existing retaining wall <br /> can remain or will need redesign/rebuild to withstand the asphalt removal. <br /> Mayor Thorne inquired regarding the long-term opportunity to buy land. Mr. Tassano mentioned <br /> the property owner would likely grant an easement; however, it would likely entail concessions <br /> toward any future development by the property owner. He noted there are two distinct user groups <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 9 December 4. 2018 <br />