Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager Nelson Fialho noted several emails have been received by the City on this matter <br /> which should be part of the deliberation and discussion. The emails request confirmation of the <br /> City Council's authority to restripe the bridge to four lanes. He noted the history of this particular <br /> issue, stating the two-year deferral of the restriping to four lanes was a result of the transportation <br /> politics in play in 2010. He noted the "undoing" of approvals of the Staples Ranch development <br /> due, in part, to a flaw in the Environmental Impact Report. Concurrently, there were negotiations <br /> with petitioners and the City Council adopted the Staples Ranch Policy Statement. The Staples <br /> Ranch Policy Statement became the basis for the revised environmental documents, revised <br /> specific plan, and the development agreement that was executed by the City Council and the <br /> Alameda County Surplus Authority. Embedded in all documents is the authority for the City <br /> Council to have the discretion to open the road to four lanes after the two-year review period. City <br /> Manager Fialho stated the specific language provision in the document. <br /> City Manager further noted the politics of the time period were such as the other entities did not <br /> trust that Pleasanton would undo the approval in a subsequent year, and the last leg of State <br /> Route 84 was politically supported by the region. If all parties collaborated on the road system, the <br /> region which controls the prioritization of regional improvements would prioritize State Route 84. <br /> This agreement does not supersede the City Council's discretion to restripe to four lanes and the <br /> document is available for public review. <br /> Mayor Thorne stated the outside entities have kept their end of the bargain and they now trust <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> Councilmember Brown inquired as to the intent of the agreement, which also includes Jack <br /> London Boulevard to be restriped to four lanes, and a local parallel arterial system with each <br /> agency to be open for each phase of the project. City Manager Fialho responded each agency <br /> may choose to open up their roadway per the agreement. <br /> Councilmember Brown listed the names of the various entities that were parties to the original <br /> agreement and inquired whether they were noticed of the public hearing. City Manager Fialho <br /> stated the notification required for the public hearing included approximately 1800 locations and <br /> was the same "geo-area" noticed originally in 2010. <br /> Councilmember Brown expressed preference of reviewing options for this item and continuance of <br /> the public hearing so key entities can weigh in on the matter. She encouraged those who were <br /> present tonight to speak to place their input into the record and the matter will be continued for <br /> discussion and deliberation at the next City Council meeting. <br /> Councilmember Pentin clarified there is a viable document which states the City Council has <br /> discretion tonight to restripe the bridge to four lanes and inquired as to the need to continue this <br /> matter to a future meeting. <br /> City Manager Fialho noted the City Council procedures for continuance. <br /> Councilmember Brown stated her preference to continue this matter to the next regular meeting. <br /> Barbara Hemphill, Stoneridge Creek resident, noted the specific plan states the temporary striping <br /> would be in place for two years, after which the City Council could vote to restripe to four lanes. It <br /> has now been five years and there are significant safety hazards with the current two-lane <br /> arrangement. She expressed concern that the two-lane configuration could delay medical <br /> assistance to the community which could result in an unfortunate fatality. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 9 October 16, 2018 <br />