My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
120418
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2018 5:01:06 PM
Creation date
11/27/2018 5:01:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/4/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Olson inquired regarding phase one and phase two of the project, as well as the <br /> outcome if financing does not develop from the San Joaquin side. Mr. Tree noted phase one will <br /> be Dublin-Pleasanton to Greenville to hook-up with ACE and phase two would be Lathrop to <br /> Stockton. Early phase one could also go to Mountain House which gets the link into San Joaquin. <br /> Mayor Thorne noted there are advocates for the project on the San Joaquin side and they can put <br /> in their share of the project funding. Mr. Tree noted $600 million of the project will be spent in <br /> Alameda County. <br /> Councilmember Narum inquired as to the entity which will operate the project once it is <br /> completed. Mr. Tree noted the potential operators will be studied in phase two of the analysis, and <br /> will include review of BART, ACE, Valley Link or another contractor. <br /> Councilmember Narum inquired whether the Joint Powers Authority had the jurisdiction to tax if <br /> Valley Link were to operate the train and the fare box did not cover expenses. Mr. Tree reported <br /> the financing of the project will be studied in phase two and will take a deep dive into the <br /> operating and maintenance costs. He detailed the formula 5307 funding combined with farebox <br /> return percentage will likely result in a funding gap. The MTC and ACTC organizations will review <br /> the potential gap and the San Joaquin Council of Governments will review the transportation <br /> element. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened public comment. <br /> Vaughn Wolfe stated the cost of this project will run $3.5 billion over the next twenty years and <br /> said there are alternatives which should be contemplated prior to moving forward with the <br /> proposed Valley Link. He spoke regarding the stated ridership which will be matched by the <br /> 95,000 traveling on the 1-580. There was been no conversation regarding the vehicles which will <br /> pass through Pleasanton on their way to the Silicon Valley. He suggested delaying the vote on <br /> this item until alternatives have been considered, as the current proposal is not a solution to the <br /> traffic <br /> Mayor Thorne closed public comment. <br /> Councilmember Brown expressed gratitude for the discussions on this item and noted that she <br /> appreciated Mr. Vaughn's comments about alternatives. At this time, the project is in phase one <br /> and if funding is not available for phase two, she said she would like to see the 1-580 corridor to <br /> Greenville completed. <br /> Councilmember Pentin said the first phase included Greenville and there was likely a unanimous <br /> vote not to expand to ACE. However, he noted there will be pressure to continue service into <br /> Santa Clara and Silicon Valley. The process has to commence at some point and this matter <br /> under consideration tonight is a first step. <br /> Mayor Thorne noted San Joaquin must pay its own way to participate. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Olson to adopt and waive full reading of Resolution No. 18-1051 <br /> supporting a rail connection between the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and Altamont Corridor <br /> Express Rail System using a Multiple Unit system. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Olson, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 9 October 16,2018 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.