Laserfiche WebLink
Nexus-Based Affordable Housing Fee Analysis for For-Sale Housing <br /> Draft Report 02/26/18 <br /> A. Market-Rate Household Income Levels. The expected price of the unit is based on <br /> market data regarding the actual transaction prices of homes of various sizes. The <br /> required income levels of households occupying new market-rate housing are derived <br /> based on the unit's mortgage, property taxes, insurance, and other fees, assuming <br /> standard housing cost expenses as a proportion of overall household income. For <br /> example, a typical household purchasing a 2,500-square foot market-rate home for $1.24 <br /> million would have an income of roughly $191,000, if they spend 30 percent of their <br /> income on housing costs. <br /> B. Household Expenditures. Based on the household income computed in Step A, <br /> Consumer Expenditure Survey data is used to evaluate the typical spending patterns of <br /> the household. This analysis provides an estimate of how much the household spends on <br /> specific categories of expenditures, such as"Food at Home." As the households' income <br /> increases with the size and value of the market-rate units, the total spending on goods <br /> and services also increases. The Consumer Expenditure Survey also indicates that these <br /> relationships are not linear (e.g., a household with twice the income does not necessarily <br /> spend twice as much on food). <br /> C. Job Creation and Worker Households. Having estimated the households' spending on <br /> various items, that spending is then converted into an estimation of jobs created. For <br /> each expenditure category, data regarding average worker wages and the ratio between <br /> gross business receipts and wages are used to translate these household expenditures <br /> into the total number of private-sector workers. For selected public-sector jobs that <br /> typically grow in proportion to the local population size (e.g., teachers), the demand for <br /> new workers is estimated by relating current levels of employment in such categories to <br /> the current population and applying this ratio to future development. Because each new <br /> worker does not represent an independent household (Pleasanton has an average of 1.67 <br /> workers per working household), the total number of new households created is <br /> somewhat less than the number of new jobs created. EPS has further adjusted the <br /> household formation rates to reflect the fact that a certain proportion of workers will not <br /> form their own households, particularly those of younger ages.' <br /> D. Worker Households by Income Category. Each worker household generated is <br /> assigned to an income category—represented as a proportion of AMI ranging from 50 to <br /> 120 percent—based on its estimated gross wages. This provides the total number of <br /> households generated at each income level by construction of market-rate units at <br /> various sizes and price points. The results indicate that residents of smaller, lower-priced <br /> units generate fewer worker households requiring affordable housing than do residents of <br /> larger, higher-priced units. <br /> 1 BLS data indicates that 12.5% of retail/restaurant workers are age 16-19, but an average of only <br /> 1.9% of workers overall (this factor is applied to other industries). EPS has assumed that such young <br /> workers do not form their own households. <br /> Economic& Planning Systems, Inc. 4 P,5,000.X151111Pkzvnto,ee R<Wrt,fforda k_Hcu,ing,s111,.�rt022618lo.sal.doc. <br />