09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Pleasanton Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Draft Report 07/12/18 Service Population Calculations The DIF is predicated on calculations that translate the population and employment projections provided above into estimates of existing and future "service populations." The "service population," in turn, is derived from assumptions that compare residents and employees based on the relative service demands or typical service profiles of each. The service population calculations associated with facilities designed to serve both residential and nonresidential uses are based on the relationships summarized in Table 4. These calculations compare City residents and employees based on commute patterns and the estimated proportion of"working" hours spent within the City. After accounting for commute patterns, the typical worker is estimated to have a service burden of about 67 percent of the typical resident. Table 4 Daytime Population Employee Weight Estimate* Commute Patterns(1) Resident to Employee Equivalencies Service Population Category # Distribution Weight Weighted Avg. Normalized to 100% Pleasanton Residents Not in Labor Force 41,828 55% 100% 55% Employed in the City 5,767 8% 100% 8% Employed Outside of the City 28,321 37% 50% 19% Total Residents 75,916 100% 81% 100% Pleasanton Jobs Live in the City 5,767 10% 100% 10% Live Outside the City 53,424 90% 50% 45% Total Jobs 59,191 100% 55% 67% *Note: this table is based on 2015 data which is the latest year for which the detailed breakdown utilized in this analysis is available. (1)Based on data from On The Map 2015. Sources:On The Map 2013,Department of Finance,and Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. Based on the projections and relationships described above EPS has derived future population, employment and service population projections for Pleasanton at buildout, as summarized in Table 5. As shown, the City's service population is projected to grow by 17 percent by build- out. This percentage increase in growth is an important factored use to allocate costs between existing and new growth in this study. Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 7 P:\151000s\151111PleasantonFee‘Report\151111_FeeNexus_071218.docx